Home / Robert Farley / Cheonan Damage Consistent with a Torpedo

Cheonan Damage Consistent with a Torpedo

Comments
/
/
/
432 Views

See Geoff Forden on the typical damage profile of a modern torpedo, and how that relates to Cheonan.

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • DocAmazing

    What’s Korean for Lusitania?

  • Marc

    As one or more comments have pointed out (and the author himself mentioned in passing), the damage is consistent with a torpedo or a mine exploding under the keel. Ignoring the mine aspect biases the discussion towards assuming it was a planned act…

    • Robert Farley

      Two things:

      1. I find the mine less likely; no mines from the war have been discovered since 1986, and in any case it would be extremely unlikely for a single mine to find its way into this area and then hit a ship.

      2. If it was a mine, that hardly indicates lack of intention; mines are often laid with the intention of destroying ships.

  • Anonymous

    Rusitania’uu?

    I’m liking the random or loose mine theory, meself. Looks like the corvette was hit in the port bow, which was facing the island, from what I can gather. I suppose it’s also possible that a North sub captain decided that they had been spotted and cornered.
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/dprk/s-sango.htm

  • wengler

    Whatever the cause of the sinking, I would hesitate to leap to the conclusion that it is part of an overall strategy by the DPRK leadership. Ship sinkings and seizures have long been a feature of the 60 year conflict between the two Koreas.

    This conflict has also featured a far more serious actions including the Burma bombing, so there is no reason to consider this a prelude to a wider war.

  • Pingback: Milking the Cheonan Intrigue « Left Flank()

It is main inner container footer text