Subscribe via RSS Feed

Author Page for Robert Farley

rss feed

Team of Destiny?

[ 0 ] September 16, 2006 |

Thirteen point deficit with 3:11 left in the 4th quarter? No problem.


Getting Medieval

[ 0 ] September 15, 2006 |


Iraqi security forces will dig trenches around Baghdad and set up checkpoints along all roads leading into the city to reduce some of the violence plaguing the capital, the Interior Ministry said Friday.


”Trenches will be dug around Baghdad in the coming weeks when the third part of the Baghdad security plan is implemented,” Khalaf said. Metropolitan Baghdad has a circumference of about 60 miles.

The security plan, known as Operation Together Forward, began June 15 and is being implemented in three phases. The first phase included setting up random checkpoints around the city, phase two began Aug. 7 and focused on the most violence-prone areas of Baghdad — mostly the Sunni Arab southern districts. Phase three reportedly includes cordoning off and searching other parts of Baghdad, including predominantly Shiite areas.

Khalaf said that except for the trenches, vehicle and pedestrian traffic would be restricted to just 28 entry points with manned checkpoints.

”We will leave only 28 inlets to Baghdad while all other inlets will be blocked. Supports will be added to the trenches to hinder the movements of people and vehicles. The trenches will be under our watch,” he said.

It hardly needs to be mentioned that, under circumstances like this, expectation that social or economic life can proceed at anything approaching normality or productivity is absurd.

[ 0 ] September 15, 2006 |

Friday Cat Blogging… Nelson

I Hate Idiots

[ 0 ] September 13, 2006 |

Moron whose name escapes me on ESPN:

The problem with the Tigers is that they strikeout too much. They need to start manufacturing runs. Look at tonight.

Tonight they lost 11-3. That’s a lot of runs to manufacture.

Blathering nonsensically about manufacturing runs is the baseball equivalent of advocating random wars in political punditry. It’s crazy and it makes no sense, but for some reason people think that you’re “serious”. I guess it’s just too obvious to say that good pitching, lots of baserunners, and some guys who can hit the ball a long way help you win games.

That Doesn’t Seem Very Labor Friendly…

[ 0 ] September 13, 2006 |


Communist leaders across the world are not keen on retirement, and veteran Indian Marxist Jyoti Basu is being told by comrades not to break the tradition.

On Wednesday the 93-year-old pleaded with the Communist Party of India (Marxist) politburo to be allowed to retire in view of his advanced age.

But the politburo turned down his request with a resounding “nyet”. They have told the veteran West Bengal politician that he must remain active in politics at least until 2008.


The veteran leader, who was chief minister of the West Bengal for 22 years from 1978, was not very amused. “I am feeling very weak at times these days,” he said while he walked past journalists, helped by his long-time assistant Joy Krishna Ghosh. Jyoti Basu recently injured his right leg after a fall at his Salt Lake residence in Calcutta.


[ 0 ] September 12, 2006 |

Interesting; the extant polling has seriously understated support for an incumbent against a primary opponent twice in the last month. I understand that polling for a primary is one of the most difficult tasks in the business (putting together a likely voter model is particularly onerous), but I would think that something more productive could be learned from this experience.


[ 0 ] September 12, 2006 |

Apropos of nothing, I’ve been giving some thought to Kill Bill. I agree with Scott that KB is Tarantino’s weakest work, but this isn’t saying very much; his first three films are among the best of the 90s. Tarantino’s extraordinarily annoying personality sometimes makes us forget that he’s a magnificent filmmaker. For some reason, his irritating sociability irks me (and others) more than the genuine misanthropy of any number of other directors.

Anyway, Kill Bill combines a largely unengaging storyline (to me, at least) with technical mastery, and provides an occasional showpiece for Tarantino’s most exceptional strengths. Tarantino’s two most important talents are his ability to write dialogue and his capacity to bring out the best in mediocre actors. In Kill Bill, I think it’s fair to say that the second is on impressive display; David Carradine isn’t just good, he’s GREAT, and one of the flaws of the first film is that he’s not on display often enough. I find it interesting to think about what Tarantino could do with other mediocre actors; what about Keanu Reeves, for example? Regarding the former, the Chiba-Thurman restaurant scene must be rated among the strongest that Tarantino has ever written and directed. Thurman in particular does an outstanding job shifting from the innocent and hapless American to the vengeful killer, all in four lines of dialogue.

Anyway, the exceptional aspects of the films make me more tolerant of the wankery. Tarantino is one of those few popular figures who have become so overrated that they are, in an important sense, underrated; his reputation tends to get in the way of the genuine quality of his product. There are few directors I can think of who, with only five films, have demonstrated a more consistent level of mastery. Kubrick, perhaps, would be another.

SOB of the Day

[ 0 ] September 12, 2006 |

Joel Mowbray.

Kentuckans in Space

[ 0 ] September 12, 2006 |

This is old news, but probably not well known. For some reason, my adoptive state has decided to join the space race:

Kentucky will become the nation’s first state to send a satellite into space — probably by late 2007 — in a cooperative venture among state universities and agencies designed to promote education, research and economic development.

The satellite program, announced Thursday at the state Council on Postsecondary Education, could help attract high-tech businesses to what is being touted as “Silicon Holler” near Morehead State University, said Morehead President Wayne Andrews.


The KySat program, expected to cost $375,000 to $400,000, will be funded with state money from the universities and NASA grants, Kimel said. He envisions launching new satellites “with increasing complexity” every 12 to 18 months.

The first satellite will serve mainly as an education tool for Kentucky students, ranging from kindergarten through college. The satellite will have a camera, data storage and a UHF/VHF radio for student and ham radio users.

Tom Layzell, president of the education council, said the KySat program fosters collaboration among the universities, strengthens the state’s position in the “knowledge economy” and further opens an “engineering pipeline” by “creating exciting opportunities for students.”

Garrett Chandler of Quitman, Texas, a UK master’s degree student in electrical engineering, was excited about KySat’s emphasis on outreach to K-12 students. “This is important because the second-, third- and fourth-graders today are going to be developing the manned mission to Mars,” he said. “The emphasis is not just to launch a satellite but to build a pipeline to K-12.”

If it were up to me, and if I were trying to improve on Kentucky’s 48th ranked math and science high school test scores, I’d probably spend the $400 grand trying to improve our math and science test scores.

I’m just sayin’.


[ 0 ] September 12, 2006 |

Huh. As a long term and vocal critic of Finnish foreign policy, I’m not sure how I feel about being Finland. I’m also unsure about how the scores were computed; I imagine they probably shorted the Russians a bit on expertise, and likely the Americans as well. Via Arms and Influence.

You scored as Finland. Your army is the army of Finland. You prefer to win your enemy by your wit rather than superior weapons. Enemy will have a hard time against your small but effective force.







British and the Commonwealth


France, Free French and the Resistance


United States




Soviet Union




In which World War 2 army should you have fought?
created with

Executive Authority

[ 0 ] September 12, 2006 |

At the risk of wandering into Scott’s territory, it seems obvious to me that the Framers understood the dangers of executive power in wartime, and that they intendeded that Congress have significant powers to restrain the President. At the time of the writing of the Constitution, the Republic had been at war for well over half of its history, and this war was conducted, in large part, with a weak executive. Now, certainly the Constitution was designed in part to remedy the difficulties of engaging in international politics (including the fighting of wars) with a weak federal government, but the institutions established seem to have no particular preference for strong executive over strong legislative power in wartime. Indeed, it would seem quite the opposite…

I suppose that the next argument would be that the character of war and of international relations has changed so much over the last two hundred years that the burden of decision ought to shift, for wholly practical reasons, to the executive branch. Certainly, the conduct of foreign policy has become more complex since 1790, with the duties of even peacetime embassies and foreign stations dwarfing those of a hundred years ago. Warfare, and especially the support of the war-making machine, has also grown significantly more complex. It could be argued that this increase in complexity should result in the shifting of important decision-making from elected and appointed officials to career professionals in both the foreign policy and military services. Even if this is true, I’m not convinced that the trend should affect the balance of responsibility between the executive and legislative branches. The executive branch is every bit as susceptible to political pressure and political difficulty as the legislative, and the legislative has as much (and perhaps more) opportunity to accumulate and act on professional expertise as the executive.

It could also be argued that the tempo of international politics (and war) has increased to the degree that the normal legislative process is too cumbersome to operate properly in response to a foreign threat. It’s probably fair in the context of, say, a nuclear attack that the some important decisions need to be made by the executive without resort to immediate legislative input. But that only goes so far; most decisions, even in wartime, don’t require snap judgements (the invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan could certainly have been deliberated upon, as could the various decisions regarding the disposition of detainees), and, moreover, to say that the executive should be able to make some decisions without legislative input does not mean that it can make those decisions without legislative oversight and evaluation. It’s this, in particular, that Yoo and the Bush administration seem most unhappy about, but post hoc evaluation of executive decisions is absolutely critical to the functioning of a liberal democracy, and in particular to the construction of the institutions of governance in the United States.

The final point to be raised is that the assertion of increased executive power during wartime must be limited to some kind of time frame. In other words, even if you think that the gravity of decision-making shifts to the executive during war, there must be some mechanism for determining whether a state of war exists and when that state will cease. In the context of the War on Terror, which is essentially a conflict against a tactic, the war can, almost by definition, never end. It surely was not the intent of the Framers, and it surely is not defensible on its own merits, that the executive should be able to aggregate to itself emergency powers without any specific temporal limitation on those powers.

Early Admission

[ 0 ] September 12, 2006 |


Harvard Ends Early Admission, Citing Barrier to Disadvantaged

Mr. Thacker and other critics said that under binding early admission programs, students have to commit to a college long before they know how much aid they will be offered. Students who apply for admission in the regular cycle are able to compare financial-aid offerings from various colleges before making up their minds in April.

Fear of being committed to a school before having any idea how much financial aid would be available certainly affected my college application decisions. Even though my school councilor explained to me that there was no way they could force me to attend a particular college, I was still concerned about signing a piece of paper that committed me to attendance when I didn’t know if I’d have the cash.

Page 357 of 477« First...102030...355356357358359...370380390...Last »