So, I have received no small number of questions and e-mails in response to this post; here is a short explanation.On Sunday afternoon, Davida and I rented a car and.
Yesterday, many conservatives managed to work themselves into a lather about a plausible interpretation of the Constitution with exceptionally few real-world consequences. I noticed much less outrage about the Court's.
The only real suspense about D.C. v. Heller was 1)how exactly the right to bear arms was defined and 2)what the lineup would be. The D.C. gun ban was clearly.
Duh:A new book from Stanford University Press called Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance proposes that . . . we need rigorous and careful thinking about the structure and.
Mr. Ralph Nader -- in a good position to speak on such issues, having earned 0% of the votes of African American women in 2000 while successfully achieving his goal.
Today's decision in Kennedy v. Louisiana is a fairly typical Eighth Amendment case. The relevant textual language -- "nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted" -- can evidently accommodate multiple outcomes.
djw -- who thankfully encouraged me to a see a rare screening of L'Eau Froide at a tiny theater in Seattle -- will be especially happy with this addition...
- To the Revolution!
- There Are About A Thousand Of Us
- Three more summary executions from the Peace President
- NFL Open Thread: The Battle of Los Angeles Edition
- Revolution blues
- Erik Visits an American Grave, Part 2,018
- Music Notes
- You didn’t want to throw your fishing line in that old main stream
- Pam Bondi immediately opens nakedly partisan Epstein investigation after Trump demands it
- Week 43
