Yesterday, many conservatives managed to work themselves into a lather about a plausible interpretation of the Constitution with exceptionally few real-world consequences. I noticed much less outrage about the Court's.
The only real suspense about D.C. v. Heller was 1)how exactly the right to bear arms was defined and 2)what the lineup would be. The D.C. gun ban was clearly.
Duh:A new book from Stanford University Press called Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance proposes that . . . we need rigorous and careful thinking about the structure and.
Mr. Ralph Nader -- in a good position to speak on such issues, having earned 0% of the votes of African American women in 2000 while successfully achieving his goal.
Today's decision in Kennedy v. Louisiana is a fairly typical Eighth Amendment case. The relevant textual language -- "nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted" -- can evidently accommodate multiple outcomes.
djw -- who thankfully encouraged me to a see a rare screening of L'Eau Froide at a tiny theater in Seattle -- will be especially happy with this addition...
Given the credible assumption that Scalia will be writing the Court's likely-to-be-a-landmark 2nd Amendment opinion in Heller, Mike O'Shea claims that this is "great news for those who are mainly.
Dodd and Feingold to filibuster the House's awful FISA bill in the Senate. And Reid is co-sponsoring an amendment stripping the bill of the provisions providing retroactive immunity for corporations.
- They hold some quarter
- Voting Fraudsters Indicted In Arizona
- NBA Playoff Open Thread
- Bird Flu – H5N1 – Status
- Another free speech warrior comes out against campus protests
- The Best Writing on Israel/Palestine I’ve Seen
- I Wonder If There’s Anything Going On Outside of Columbia University Student Protests?
- Calling out the Southern Exploiters
- The world is changed: Cassandra on Zoloft
- Erik Visits an American Grave, Part 1,610