Author: Scott Lemieux
Since paperwight argues convincingly that the Dayton Amendment would not have pre-empted tougher state laws, I think the Democratic Senators who voted against should be called out and held to.
This Phoebe Maltz post (via Yglesias) raises some interesting issues. But more than anything, it reinforces my belief that "gentrification" is, at least as a normative concept, entirely worthless. (And, at.
Cynthia Gorney's repetition of contrarian-wisdom-so-frequently-offered-it's-conventional-wisdom reminds me that I owe a reply to Nathan Newman. Nathan offers a powerful response to my claim that social change produced through litigation doesn't produce more.
I have no particularly strong view with respect to the constitutionality of the execution of adolescents. I do feel strongly that arguments for categorical death penalty abolitionism based on the.
Prof. B notes the fact that Scalia used his dissent in Roper v. Simmons to mysteriously launch some spittle with respect to the Court's abortion jurisprudence. As William Saletan notes, this is doubly.
Fair warning: What follows is a post on constitutional reasoning by the member of this blog who doesn't know anything about it, not to be confused with the one who.
In the comments to my post about the recent California prison segregation case, Mark Kleiman notes that my focus on Thomas and Scalia's misadventures in doctrinal bad faith sidestep the important.
With all due respect, I think that Ezra Klein is misreading the arguments being made about Goldwater's legacy. At least as I read Drum, Yglesias and DeLong, there's no contradiction between.
