Home / General / The Art of Protesting Too Much

The Art of Protesting Too Much

Comments
/
/
/
2349 Views

Donald Trump lost in on Twitter yesterday because he knows the chances that there’s an innocent explanation for the actions of Paul Manafort, International Man of Seven-Figure Haberdashery, are about the same as the odds of the Mets winning the World Series this year:

The most notable revelations from the first few days of Manafort’s trial were about his lavish lifestyle. Witnesses described millions of dollars worth of home renovations, a multi-million-dollar residence purchased for his daughter, and more than a million dollars spent on suits in a five-year period. “By the time he bought that $15,000 ostrich jacket,” observes Andrew Prokop of The Washington Post, “Manafort already owned a $9,500 ostrich vest.”

Of course, this kind of extravagant spending might be gross, but it’s not criminal. But what’s important is not what Manafort bought, it’s how he paid for it all. He spent nearly $1 million at the exclusive Manhattan boutique Alan Couture, and nearly all of those purchases were made by wire transfers from foreign accounts. According to a salesperson, Manafort was the only customer to pay this way. His spending on homes was also generally done through secret accounts.

The prosecution’s theory is that Manafort used secret offshore accounts to fund his lavish lifestyle because he was hiding money for tax purposes and submitting fraudulent loan applications. Whether further evidence will persuade the jury remains to be seen, but it is enormously unlikely that all of this was on the level.

The president knows this, and it has him worried.

As Manafort was in federal court, Trump engaged in one of his patented Twitter tantrums, railing against the prosecution. He did not claim that Manafort would be vindicated and found innocent. Rather, he tweeted that“this is a terrible situation and Attorney General Jeff Sessions should stop this Rigged Witch Hunt right now, before it continues to stain our country any further.”

Trump’s surrogates, Jay Sekulow and Rudy Giuliani, were quick to clarify that the tweets did not represent a formal order for Sessions to fire Mueller. But that Trump would encourage his attorney general to stop an investigation that potentially implicates his own campaign is disturbing nonetheless.

[…]

But Trump is nonetheless worried, as he should be. As David Eckles-Wade argues at Reuters, the Manafort trial is ultimately — if indirectly — “about how Russia moves money and buys influence.” It seems that, owing to his lavish lifestyle, Manafort was in serious debt when he agreed to run Trump’s campaign “for free.” Considering his extensive ties to the Kremlin and his surreptitious meetings with Russians during the 2016 campaign, the implications of Manafort being found guilty are obvious.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
It is main inner container footer text