Or so states perhaps the most interesting email I received today on my work account (just nudging out a solicitation to submit a manuscript to the Beijing Law Review). Said “book” is never mentioned by title in the email, nor does it appear available on Amazon. Ignoring these red flags, following are excerpts from the email to serve as inspiration for all of us to track down this necessary truth:
Dimitri Khalezov has spent 10 years researching and writing this book.
Or read at:
I dare you.
In a 2010 interview, Khalezov explained that you can’t build a
skyscraper in NYC without an approved demolition plan. On 9/11, the
World Trade Center’s demolition plan was put into action to demolish the
Khalezov learned of this demolition plan from his job in the Soviet
Union. He had worked in the nuclear intelligence unit and under an
agreement between the Soviet Union and the USA, each country was obliged
to inform the other of peaceful uses of nuclear explosions. The WTC
was built with 3 thermo-nuclear charges in its foundations.
Note: underground nuclear explosions do not produce mushroom clouds.
This is only ever seen when the explosion takes place above ground. On
9/11, the explosions were deep underground.
[. . .]
I know it is preposterous to claim that the WTC was brought down by
nukes but go check the definition of ‘Ground Zero’ in the old
dictionaries you have at home. You’ll find that there would only be one
definition and it would be a place where a nuclear explosion has
After 9/11, the US government sent people round to every bookshop and
public library on the planet to replace ALL the dictionaries with
amended versions which have more definitions for ‘Ground Zero’. For
example, the new versions (even of old editions) of the Merriam-Webster
dictionaries have two extra definitions which are:
2: the center or origin of rapid, intense, or violent activity or change
3: the very beginning : SQUARE ONE
Ah, I’m convinced. Convinced enough where I now know more about the truther movement than I ever feared I would. Seems the ‘mini-nuke theory’ is perceived by the more mainstream members of the truther movement as peddled by “disinformation agents” as a clever ploy to “sabotage the 9/11 truth movement”. Several have spent a lot of time and effort in debunking these “ridiculous claims”, although they do recycle, or plagiarise, the same material, or there’s really only five guys that expend a herculean effort in “seeking the truth surrounding the events of the 11th of September 2001”.
Our tireless hero, Khalezov, isn’t without his few defenders in the movement. Well, I could only find one, but there must be more, as Khalezov is “a former commissioned officer of the so-called “military unit 46179”, otherwise known as “the Special Control Service” of the 12th Chief Directorate of the Defense Ministry of the USSR”, after all.
UPDATE: first two links fixed. Because you really want to, admit it.
UPDATE2: I’m not doubting the existence of Military Unit 46179, nor that it does what it says on the tin. However, what passes for the “mainstream” of the truther movement does mock his claim, if not the unit itself.