At this point, Reynolds, Malkin et al. have dug up parody's corpse to kill it again so many times I can't believe there's anything left in the grave at this point. (You'd think that a college professor might, say, take 20 seconds to check ABC's...
wingnuttery
In addition to the obvious, this quote from Joe Wilson is pretty remarkable:Wilson said it is unfair to debate rumors about Thurmond when he can no longer defend himself. The.
It's somehow reassuring to come back online and find that some things never change. It's also worth pointing out that -- in addition to the fact that there's nothing wrong.
Nat "Terri Schiavo will walk out of the hospital next week" Hentoff goes all-in on the "death panel" nonsense, while playing the martyr based on threats that must be said to remain unspecified. He also seems oblivious to the irony of accusing other people of...
It has to be some sort of landmark in American political discourse when both Lee Siegel and Camille Paglia weigh in on American health care policy. Total combined knowledge of.
There's nothing a winger pundit can do to become discredited. Indeed, if your baldfaced lies help torpedo a major progressive initiative, they're actually an asset. And, no, the damage can.
I think the passive-aggressive ones -- with Tom Maguire being the supreme example -- are my favorites. Although sometimes you have to prefer the undiluted variety; i.e. "[the transparently fake alleged birth certificate from a country that didn't exist when it was issued is] from...
It's been a while since a troll has advanced it at our site, but I've always had a morbid fascination with conservative attempts to portray doctors who perform abortions as.
Shorter Verbatim James Inhofe: "If their argument there is “Well, we don’t want to use oil and gas because we think it pollutes” — which it doesn’t." As if to.
I assume this is also the title of Kristol's forthcoming book?
Glenn Reynolds et al. are very, very serious people....and as a commenter notes, the she also beat me to the even more egregious hackwork of Reynolds and his colleagues with.
Is there anything she isn't wrong about? And I didn't even mention that, having claimed that it's totalitarian to make any inquiry into the motivation behind a homicide, she then.