Supreme Court
Deciding an appalling case in which a 17-year old was given life without parole for a violating parole, the Supreme Court held today that life-without-parole sentences for juvenile offenders violate.
I've been having a conversation with the very sharp Silvana Naguib. Particularly since my general position on this is on the record, and I think the analysis applies to anybody.
I don't mean to join in making this an all-Kagan-all-the-time blog, but some commenters have raised points that may help to clarify the argument I'm making. The question of whether.
If I understand the theory advanced by anti-SSM wingers in the Washington state petition case, it's the same one put forward by that great constitutional scholar Sarah Palin: i.e. that.
This Charlie Savage article about the politics of Obama's Supreme Court nominations starts off by reminding us that attempting to preempt conservative claims that a Supreme Court nominee is a.
Over at the Prospect I make the case for nominating an actual liberal for the Supreme Court. In particular, there's no political reason for not doing so: It might be.
No huge surprise here, but John Paul Stevens will be resigning this summer. [UPDATE: more from Liptak.] I hope Obama will consider that since 1916 this seat on the Court.
I know we've dealt with part of this already, but here's more Goldberg tendentiousness: Lepore mentions that the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 in the Buck v. Bell case, led by.