reproductive freedom
Alleged sensibly moderate Republican Michael Gerson displays some actual sensible moderation: Try to imagine a parent-daughter conversation about sexual restraint and maturity that includes the words: “Honey, I’m going to.
Prick Erry is, of course, also a radical anti-choice crank. But don't kid yourself, this will really hurt him among the two or three Tea Party voters who only care.
Steve King. More here.
If anti-choicers were motivated by a desire to protect fetal live, rather than the desire to impose reactionary gender rules, they wouldn't be opposed to providing contraception too. Needless to.
As a sort of mirror image to the centrist contrarians who erroneously believe that Roe is irrelevant because a woman's right to choose is safe, some progressives argue that Roe.
As I've said before, I actually have a little more respect for anti-choicers who reject rape/incest exceptions, because that position is actually more internally consistent. That's not to say that.
When even The New Republic publishes an article explaining why the countermobilization myth that's grown up around Roe is nonsense, it makes me think that we're actually learning something.
A reader alerted us to this amazingly creepy National Review piece about Steven Tyler's decision to use marriage an especially gross grant of legal guardianship to legalize a relationship that.