libya
My WPR column this week: The inability of the Afghan Model to manage the post-conflict environment would be a problem even if the coalition was prepared to fully commit to.
Robert Haddick has predictions: From a military perspective, the coalition air campaign looks to be ahead of plan – the burning tanks near Benghazi show that. But without a quick.
In dialectic form.
Grover Cleveland asks what he asked in our comments, namely what we should make about the lack of congressional involvement in the decision to attack Libya. A few points: Obama's.
All very much worth reading, and although we've already been discussing it I think he's especially good on the "but then what?" question: Launching air strikes is the easiest, most.
As I suggested in a previous post, the Libya operation makes comments like this even more on point: Amongst the most desperately short-sighted decisions of the SDSR was the frankly.
Bryan McGrath is quite right; current operations in Libya are geared not toward creating a "no fly zone," but rather towards establishing air supremacy. The difference between the two.
Peggy Noonan said something insightful. This may well be the most shocking event of 2011 thus far. The biggest takeaway, the biggest foreign-policy fact, of the past decade is this:.