Subscribe via RSS Feed

Tag: "bloggingheads"

Able Archer

[ 44 ] May 17, 2013 | Robert Farley

National Security Archive has put together an interesting collection of material on the 1983 Able Archer exercise, which freaked the Russians out.

“Do you think Soviet leaders really fear us, or is all the huffing and puffing just part of their propaganda?” President Reagan asked his Ambassador to the Soviet Union, Arthur Hartman in early 1984, according to declassified talking points from the Reagan Presidential Library. President Reagan had pinpointed the question central to the 1983 War Scare. That question was key to the real-time intelligence reporting, the retroactive intelligence estimates and analyses of the danger, and it remains the focus of today’s continuing debate over the danger and lessons of the so-called “Able Archer” War Scare.

Some, such as Robert Gates, who was the CIA’s deputy director for intelligence during the War Scare, have concluded, “After going through the experience at the time, then through the postmortems, and now through the documents, I don’t think the Soviets were crying wolf. They may not have believed a NATO attack was imminent in November 1983, but they did seem to believe that the situation was very dangerous.”[1] Others, such as the CIA’s national intelligence officer for the Soviet Union, Fritz Ermarth, wrote in the CIA’s first analysis of the War Scare, and still believes today, that because the CIA had “many [Soviet] military cook books” it could “judge confidently the difference between when they might be brewing up for a real military confrontation or … just rattling their pots and pans.”[2]

“Huffing and puffing?” “Crying wolf?” “Just rattling their pots and pans?” While real-time analysts, retroactive re-inspectors, and the historical community may be at odds as to how dangerous the War Scare was, all agree that the dearth of available evidence has made conclusions harder to deduce. Some historians have even characterized the study of the War Scare as “an echo chamber of inadequate research and misguided analysis” and “circle reference dependency,” with an overreliance upon “the same scanty evidence.”[3]

To mark the 30th anniversary of the War Scare, the National Security Archive is posting, over three installments, the most complete online collection of declassified U.S. documents, material no longer accessible from the Russian archives, and contemporary interviews, which suggest that the answer to President Reagan’s question — were the Soviets “huffing and puffing” or genuinely afraid? — was both, not either or.

I while ago I chatted with Nate Jones on this subject:

Foreign Entanglements: Alternative Wars on Terror

[ 0 ] March 25, 2013 | Robert Farley

On this week’s episode of Foreign Entanglements, Dan Nexon and I talked about lessons of the Iraq War:

Foreign Entanglements: Classification

[ 4 ] March 4, 2013 | Robert Farley

On the latest episode of Foreign Entanglements, I spoke with Nate Jones of Unredacted about document classification:

It’s a pretty interesting diavlog; we also chatted about Able Archer, Zero Dark Thirty, and why we both prefer The Americans to Homeland.

…and no, there is no specific intent to troll this thread; the diavlog was recorded several days prior to the CNNi appearance.

Foreign Entanglements: We’re All Friends of Hamas

[ 17 ] February 23, 2013 | Robert Farley

On this week’s episode of Foreign Entanglements, Matt speaks with James Joyner about Hagel, Hamas, and Rand Paul:

Foreign Entanglements: The Hagelian Dialectic

[ 6 ] February 7, 2013 | Robert Farley

On this week’s episode of Foreign Entanglements, Matt speaks with Yousef Manayyer about Israel, Palestine, and Chuck Hagel:

Foreign Entanglements: Israeli Election Results

[ 7 ] January 24, 2013 | Robert Farley

On this week’s episode of Foreign Entanglements, Matt spoke with Gil Troy about the Israeli election results:

Foreign Entanglements: Evaluating the Latest on Gaza

[ 5 ] November 30, 2012 | Robert Farley

On this week’s episode of Foreign Entanglements, Matt speaks with Elizabeth Tsurkov about Operation Pillar of Defense:

Asymmetric Beliefs Can Lead to Bad Outcomes

[ 88 ] November 8, 2012 | Robert Farley

This may, believe it or not, be the scariest thing I’ve ever read about the modern GOP:

Romney advisers are telling CBS News that there wasn’t one person on the Romney campaign who saw the loss coming, and the GOP presidential candidate was “shellshocked” by the results. Here’s what they have to say:

  • “We went into the evening confident we had a good path to victory…I don’t think there was one person who saw this coming.”
  • “There’s nothing worse than when you think you’re going to win, and you don’t…It was like a sucker punch.”
  • Romney “was shellshocked.”

The CBS story indicates that the Romney team even bought into the “unskewed polls” theory, believing that the polls dramatically underestimated Republican turnout and overestimated Democratic enthusiasm.

This report comes after other indications that the Romney campaign was disregarding polling data.

It’s one thing for the rubes to believe that an election is in the bag when the actual chances of victory are south of 10%; indeed, a good campaign requires creating the conditions for suspension of disbelief. It’s entirely another when the braintrust of the campaign has determined to smoke its own product. When I wrote this post, I didn’t really think that the core strategists in the campaign had abandoned connection with reality; rather, I figured it was mostly #2 and #3. Asymmetric beliefs about the probabilities of success in conflict can produce bad outcomes. Another way of phrasing is that it would be remarkably more reassuring to learn that the campaign was simply lying about its chances (and, of course, they may still be); lying, at least, can be entirely rational. See also Ari Kohen on the difference between hope and delusion.

As it happens, Dan Nexon and I chatted about this just today:

Foreign Entanglements: A Red Line Here, a Bombing Campaign There…

[ 11 ] October 2, 2012 | Robert Farley

On the latest episode of Foreign Entanglements, Matt speaks with Jamie Fly about Bibi’s Bomb Cartoon speech:

Foreign Entanglements: Romney and Iran

[ 0 ] September 2, 2012 | Robert Farley

Matt and Meir Javedanfar talk Iran, Israel, and US politics:

Foreign Entanglements: Democracy in Egypt

[ 0 ] June 10, 2012 | Robert Farley

Matt Duss talks with Eric Trager:

Foreign Entanglements: Egypt Election Edition

[ 1 ] May 21, 2012 | Robert Farley

Matt Duss and Hussein Ibish talk about the election in Egypt:

Page 1 of 612345...Last »
  • Switch to our mobile site