I will have more on today's appalling disemboweling of the Voting Rights Act imminently. In the meantime, enjoy this column about why conservative constitutional arguments against affirmative action are wrong:.
It's worth having an open thread just to express anger and frustration over our Plessy-nostalgic Supreme Court ruling the most important section of the most important piece of civil rights.
Not only does reasonable moderate Sam Alito show us that there is no difference between the two parties and elections don't matter and therefore because of Edward Snowden we should.
I knew it was over when the Bruins brought Bob Stanley in to play goal. I don't dislike the Bruins generally, but given that Jacobs was a driving force behind.
What a wonderful image of the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense force in action! Note the sinking PLAN carrier Liaoning in the background. Obviously there's been some sort of dreadful accident--.
The season finale of Mad Men, "In Care Of," contains an inordinate number of what I call "Oh Really?" reverse shots. They typically don't involve dialogue -- and the episode.
The Voting Rights Act might be the main course, but the Civil Rights Act is the appetizer. I alluded to this in the article, but it's worth repeating Ginsburg's examples.
In light of the fact of his concurrence today arguing that affirmative action is the precise constitutional equivalent of Jim Crow, Clarence Thomas has done the only possible honorable thing.