<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:40:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Else is Excited for Lent Next Year? by Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2013/05/who-else-is-excited-for-lent-next-year/comment-page-1#comment-552188</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=43658#comment-552188</guid>
		<description>Hanging out with Dick Hertz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hanging out with Dick Hertz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Else is Excited for Lent Next Year? by Mean Mister Mustard</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2013/05/who-else-is-excited-for-lent-next-year/comment-page-1#comment-552185</link>
		<dc:creator>Mean Mister Mustard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=43658#comment-552185</guid>
		<description>Uh, you could have told us at what point we would see your point.  When i saw KITH, I hoped to see it, but since I sector them into the Steve Martin file I ran out of the ability to suspend my disbelief.  Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, you could have told us at what point we would see your point.  When i saw KITH, I hoped to see it, but since I sector them into the Steve Martin file I ran out of the ability to suspend my disbelief.  Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Else is Excited for Lent Next Year? by DocAmazing</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2013/05/who-else-is-excited-for-lent-next-year/comment-page-1#comment-552184</link>
		<dc:creator>DocAmazing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=43658#comment-552184</guid>
		<description>Well, they did say it was equivalent to fish...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they did say it was equivalent to fish&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Else is Excited for Lent Next Year? by Barry Freed</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2013/05/who-else-is-excited-for-lent-next-year/comment-page-1#comment-552183</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Freed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=43658#comment-552183</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s only because the beaver is wet (i.e. aquatic) that the Church permits it to be eaten for Lent. The Church would never sanction the eating of dry beavers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s only because the beaver is wet (i.e. aquatic) that the Church permits it to be eaten for Lent. The Church would never sanction the eating of dry beavers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Else is Excited for Lent Next Year? by Ronan</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2013/05/who-else-is-excited-for-lent-next-year/comment-page-1#comment-552182</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=43658#comment-552182</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d often wonder about Canadians</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d often wonder about Canadians</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Else is Excited for Lent Next Year? by Malaclypse</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2013/05/who-else-is-excited-for-lent-next-year/comment-page-1#comment-552180</link>
		<dc:creator>Malaclypse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=43658#comment-552180</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just gonna leave &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITLXo19248g&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; right here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just gonna leave <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITLXo19248g" rel="nofollow">this</a> right here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Breaking!  Lawless Obama Administration Uses So-Called &#8220;Article III&#8221; to Usurp Rule of Law! by Scott Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2013/05/breaking-lawless-obama-administration-uses-so-called-article-iii-to-usurp-rule-of-law/comment-page-1#comment-552179</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=43647#comment-552179</guid>
		<description>Yes, I will address this -- the article definitely needs some Hacker/Pierson.  Polarization definitely has gone both ways but it&#039;s not symmetrical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I will address this &#8212; the article definitely needs some Hacker/Pierson.  Polarization definitely has gone both ways but it&#8217;s not symmetrical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Else is Excited for Lent Next Year? by Barry Freed</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2013/05/who-else-is-excited-for-lent-next-year/comment-page-1#comment-552178</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Freed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=43658#comment-552178</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s gone missing and couldn&#039;t be found.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s gone missing and couldn&#8217;t be found.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Their interest in the Kaitlyn Hunt case is purely academic by Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2013/05/their-interest-in-the-kaitlyn-hunt-case-is-purely-academic/comment-page-1#comment-552177</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=43650#comment-552177</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t think a male 18-year-old who has consensual sex with a 15-year-old should be branded as a sex offender for the rest of his life, or sentenced to 15 years in prison. That’s wildly disproportionate.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The girl was 14 in this case, not that it makes much difference. Otherwise I agree in toto. I don&#039;t have a problem with punishing Hunt in some (other) way. She is old enough to know better and that rules are rules and they apply to her. I would feel exactly the same way if the case involved an 18 year old male. They should not be playing hardball with Hunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don’t think a male 18-year-old who has consensual sex with a 15-year-old should be branded as a sex offender for the rest of his life, or sentenced to 15 years in prison. That’s wildly disproportionate.</p></blockquote>
<p>The girl was 14 in this case, not that it makes much difference. Otherwise I agree in toto. I don&#8217;t have a problem with punishing Hunt in some (other) way. She is old enough to know better and that rules are rules and they apply to her. I would feel exactly the same way if the case involved an 18 year old male. They should not be playing hardball with Hunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
