Who would have thunk it? The Justice Department will issue findings Wednesday that accuse the police department in Ferguson, Mo., of racial bias and routinely violating the constitutional rights of.
A horrible atrocity: Mr. Williams was wondering why a sergeant would be doing the grunt work of conducting an impromptu drug test when, he said, a fist hammered him hard.
Marty Lederman's post is so brilliant I hesitate to excerpt, but as a teaser: As I explain below, the challengers are mistaken to assume that absurdity is the only ground.
I think it's obvious that the response of federal Republicans and the vast majority of state Republicans should the Supreme Court willfully misread the law and wreck the majority of.
Paul's thread yesterday contained some defenses of the exploitation of athletes by NCAA rules. These defenses were, of course, rife with factual errors, non-sequiturs, and transparent illogic because all defenses.
Responding to Abbe Gluck's argument that the troofer reading of the ACA violates the clear notice requirement that is now well-settled constitutional law, Ed Kilgore observes: This argument may or.
You can accuse the co-ACA Troofer-in-Chief of many things, but having shame is not one of them: “If they’re not looking at some kind of contingency plan, I think that’s.
Dutch beer available in North America is indeed the worst. And while we're dealing with arbitrary Deadspin lists, this is very solid. Craig might be the most irritating and least.
