As I alluded to earlier, tonight at 7:30pm Bryan McGrath and Jerry Hendrix will be having a debate on the future of the aircraft carrier, under the aegis of the US Naval Academy. Both of them know carriers, and have a lot to say about the future (or lack thereof) of the carrier in maritime warfare.
Author Page for Robert Farley
I waited until Erik left the country, then repeatedly stabbed him in the back. In the metaphorical sense, of course.
My colleague Erik Loomis has tried to answer those questions in Out of Sight, a book coming out in March.Loomis argues that the United States, by managing import standards, has in the past and can in the future substantially modify the employer-employee relationship in countries that export to the United States. Loomis suggests that the United States create import restrictions based on labor standards, a practice that has enjoyed some success in the past.
Loomis’ argument is relevant for the Asia-Pacific in that the proposed regulations would directly target many countries in Asia and Latin America; indeed, virtually all of the exports the U.S. draws from developing countries come from these regions. A more labor-friendly foreign policy could have significant social and economic effects across the region.
But there are two caveats.
When Hannity quoted a New York Times editorial saying it’s no time “to smear all Muslims with a terrorist brush,” Paul laughed. “I think they must be totally deaf and dumb,” he said, “Because, think about it. Think about it. I haven’t seen any Christians or Jews dragging people of the Islamic faith through the streets, but I am seeing the opposite. I’m seeing Christians beheaded, I’m seeing people who say anything about Islam being shot, unarmed, being shot.”
He continued: “And so, yeah, should the rules always protect everyone’s rights? Yeah, but I’m not worried too now that we’ve infringed on their rights, I’m worried that Christians and Jews are being killed around the world.”
But remember, if you were troubled by Senator Paul’s commitment to civil liberties before three days ago, you’re probably a liberal authoritarian.
Some stuff for your reading pleasure:
- Adam Elkus on what it means to say a terrorist attack was “sophisticated.”
- The Revolution as a drinking party.
- I highly recommend this debate between Bryan McGrath and Jerry Hendrix on the future of the aircraft carrier.
- Just gonna leave this here and walk away...
- A fantastic monologue on the future of the F-35.
- Russia finally going to go with a unitary air force? Best of luck, Vlad.
This is the last of my “trends to watch in 2015” pieces, I promise. But more to the point, it’s time for the compliance report required by the Pundit-Blogger Accountability Act:
World Series Champion: Cincinnati Reds
Number of countries playing host to Edward Snowden: 1 (Russia)
Academy Award, Best Picture: 12 Years a Slave
Senkaku/Diaoyou related incidents resulting in shots fired: 1
Afghanistan Coalition fatalities (+/-10): 80 (75)
North Korean nuclear tests: 1
Sunsets on the Syria under President of Bashar al-Assad: 365
College Basketball National Champion: University of Kentucky Wildcats
Heisman Trophy: Marcus Mariota
Israeli strikes on Iran: 0
Number of successful Scottish independence referendums: 0
Supreme Court vacancies: 1
2014 3rd Quarter GDP growth (as per revisions by 12/31/14, +/-.2): 3.0% (5%)
F-22 crashes: 1 (0)
Barack Obama approval rate, 12/31/14 (+/- .3%): 44.5% (43.6%)
Number of Republican seats won, US Senate (as of 12/31/14): 48
Number of Republican seats won, US House: (as of 12/31/14, +/-2): 235 (247)
Some glaring misses, but nevertheless a record I’ll stand by. Here’s looking at your 2015:
World Series Champion: Washington Nationals
NCAA Football FBS Champion: Oregon Ducks
Number of living Castro brothers, 12/31/15: 1
Academy Award, Best Picture: Boyhood
Number of Mistral class amphibious assault ships delivered to Russia: 1
Number of fatal incidents involving collision between Russian and NATO aircraft: 1
Afghanistan Coalition fatalities: 35
North Korean nuclear tests: 1
Sunsets on Syria under President of Bashar al-Assad: 365
Number of defeats suffered by Kentucky Wildcats Men’s Basketball, 2014-5 season: 0
Heisman Trophy: Dalvin Cook, FSU
Israeli strikes on Iran: 0
Number of formal agreements between Iran and the United States on the future of Iran’s nuclear program: 1
Number of Coalition aircraft shot down by ISIS: 1
Supreme Court vacancies: 1
2014 3rd Quarter GDP growth (as per revisions by 12/31/15, +/-.2): 2.8%
F-35 crashes: 1
Barack Obama approval rate, 12/31/15 (+/- .3%): 45.1%
European benchmark Brent oil, 12/31/15 (+/- $2.00): $61
Note that nominations are open for the 2015 Duckies, which honor the best blogging on international relations. Categories include:
- Best Blog (Group) in IR
- Best Blog (Individual) in IR
- Best Blog Post in IR
- Best New Blogger (Individual) in IR — this can be anyone new blogging in an individual or group blog.
My latest at the National Interest takes a look at India’s nuclear program:
This article examines the development of the nuclear program over history, the current state of the program and its associated delivery system projects, the strategic rationale of India’s nuclear efforts, and the likely future contours of the program. The current balance of nuclear power in South and East Asia is unstable, and likely to result in a nuclear arms race involving Pakistan, India, and China.
Let us quote liberally from the esteemed Mr. Charles Pierce:
However, because the Heisman Trophy is as weighted toward quarterbacks as a papal conclave is weighted toward cardinals, Marcus Mariota of Oregon won. Cooper finished a ridiculous third. I mention all of this because, in the opening round of the inaugural Cash Drop in college football this year, Mariota will go up against last year’s winner, the curiously unindicted Jameis Winston, who (I suspect) will lead the Tallahassee Conspiracy To Obstruct Justice to a whopping win that will make the Heisman voting this year look even worse. The CTOJ will then move on to the first national championship game of the playoff era. Win or lose, this will make the entire enterprise look worse than the Heisman Trophy does.
2014 was an interesting year for LGM, with the celebration of our tenth anniversary, and the (at this point wildly popular) introduction of comment registration. Here are our ten top posts of the last year, in terms of traffic:
- Christ, I Hate Blackboard (Noon)
- Brian Leiter’s Slow Motion Car Crash Accelerates (Campos)
- Conservative White Male Resentment of the Day (Loomis)
- The Ladder of Law Has No Top And No Bottom (Lemieux)
- Will American University’s law school sue students who drop out or transfer? (Campos)
- Noncompete Clauses for Fast Food Workers? (Loomis)
- Today In the New Gilded Age (Lemieux)
- And You Thought Hiring Jim Zorn Was Dumb! (Lemieux)
- Should Liberals Be Applauding Hobby Lobby? (SPOILER: No.) (Lemieux)
- If something cannot go on forever, it will stop (Campos)
Thank you from everyone at LGM for making this the best possible 2014. In addition to patronizing the site, you have, as a group, demonstrated a remarkable degree of generosity. Have a good, safe New Year’s Eve! Drink to a better 2015!
My latest at the National Interest takes a look at the development of hyper-sonic weapons:
The United States is building hypersonics for two reasons. First, we want to kill people fast, without the messy danger of a global thermonuclear war. Second, we want to be able to punch through the defensive systems of peer competitors.
Unfortunately, these two justifications contradict one another. Given that China, Russia and even India appear on their way to similar systems, we should take care before letting the technology outpace the politics.
This is an odd little explainer:
We’ve all heard the idea: In winter, your car needs a little time to warm up before you can drive it. And that’s why across the United States, people who live in cold and snowy places — and especially those whose cars have remote starters — often fire up their engines long before they start driving. Heck, they might even start the car from the kitchen in the morning, and only then start the coffee brewing.
But it turns out that this idea of idling your car during the winter is just wrong. And so are the many, many Americans who believe it — one 2009 study found that on average, Americans thought they should idle for over 5 minutes before driving when temperatures were below 32 degrees…
Idling in winter thus has no benefit to your (presumably modern) car. Auto experts today say that you should warm up the car no more than 30 seconds before you start driving in winter. “The engine will warm up faster being driven,” the EPA and DOE explain. Indeed, it is better to turn your engine off and start it again than to leave it idling.
I’ll confess; I start the car a good five minutes early, while I’m still in the process of convincing the twins to put on their damn shoes. Like every single person under the age of seventy, however, my decision to idle the car has nothing to do with prepping the carburetor. It turns out that cars, when left in a cold garage overnight, are fucking cold; starting them early makes their insides less cold. If you’re not fortunate enough to have a garage, starting them early gets you a good headstart on defrosting the windows, and I’ve been told that driving while sheets of ice still cover the windshield is both dangerous and irresponsible.
Now, I’ll grant that running the engine for five minutes to solve these two problems can be wasteful, selfish, etc. Nevertheless, an article of this sort should probably concentrate on the reasons that people actually idle their cars, rather than presume that the problem lies in ignorance of the engineering of the modern automobile. Indeed, I’d guess that the historical interest in idling a car on a cold morning has far less to do with engine health than it does with the aforementioned two factors.
At the Diplomat, I provide a handy guide to salami slicing:
Salami slicing works best against a coalition of states with uncertain levels of commitment. It identifies extended deterrence commitments as the vulnerable ligaments that hold a coalition together, and tries to place stress on those connections. Salami “slices” have greater strategic than intrinsic value, although the “slicer” can take advantage of differences in how the opposing coalition values particular objects.
Salami slicing requires long range planning, careful assessment of the commitment of an opponent. If an opponent is more interested in an excuse for aggression than in deterrence, then slicing can result in catastrophe. If the slices are too large, the effort can produce counter-balancing.