Subscribe via RSS Feed

Author Page for Erik Loomis

rss feed

Visit Erik Loomis's Website

This Day in Labor History: January 5, 1970

[ 18 ] January 5, 2012 | Erik Loomis

I had planned this post for months so it’s total coincidence that it is going up the morning after this series won the Cliopatria.

On January 5, 1970, the body of United Mine Workers of American reformer Jock Yablonski was discovered, six days after his death. Yablonski was murdered on the orders of UMWA president Tony Boyle. One of the worst things a labor union president has ever done in this country, the aftermath of Yablonski’s murder both opened the UMWA for necessary reform and helped give unions a reputation for corruption and violence that still unjustly taints it today.

The UMWA is one of the oldest and traditionally most militant unions in American history. Founded to fight against the horrible conditions Appalachian coal miners faced in 1890, it grew to be the first great industrial union in American history. It fostered some of the most legendary organizers and union leaders in American history. John Mitchell. Mother Jones. John L. Lewis. Philip Murray. Under Lewis, industrial unionism came to the forefront of American democracy. Lewis created and led the CIO in its early years. Murray, who left the UMWA and became president of the United Steelworkers of America, was the second chairman of the CIO.

But the UMWA also contributed its fair share to the top-down leadership structure that would eventually come to hurt American unions. Lewis ruled his union with an iron fist. He was the UMWA for all intents and purposes. That charismatic leadership had its advantages. Lewis could turn thousands of people out when he needed to get something done and the average mineworker, poorly uneducated and deeply impoverished, had a powerful leader who could improve their lives. But the potential for corruption was endemic in this structure. So was the placing of all power in the leadership structure and not with the rank and file.

John L. Lewis

Lewis finally stepped down as head of the UMWA in 1960. His replacement, Thomas Kennedy, was an old-timer and a weak leader. Kennedy soon became sick and was replaced by Tony Boyle in 1962. A favorite of Lewis, Boyle had relied his mentor to rise through the ranks but was never popular with workers. By the 1960s, the UMWA membership had seen their lives improve significantly. Coal mining was still a brutal occupation, but it was not 1910 and the coal companies couldn’t rule over Appalachia as a fiefdom. These were workers with demands of their leadership as well as of the companies. Yet Boyle did not seem to care much about his workers. Grievances could take years to be settled. Many accused him of being in bed with the companies. Boyle handpicked all UMWA officials and tolerated no dissent.

In 1969, a grassroots UMWA member rose to challenge Boyle. Jock Yablonski. Yablonski was a longtime union official. He headed one of the UMWA districts, which was an appointed position, but Boyle canned him in 1965. Yablonski was spurred to run against Boyle in 1968, when the UMWA president showed little interest when 78 miners died in a Farmington, West Virginia mine explosion. In front of grieving families, Boyle stated, “I share the grief. But as long as we mine coal, there is always the inherent danger of explosions.” He then did little to attack the mine owners for these deaths. Supposedly John L. Lewis was going to endorse Yablonski, but he died in the summer of 1969. Who knows how true this is. In the 69 election, Boyle defeated Yablonski by a 2-1 margin, but no one believed the final results. Yablonski called for a federal investigation for voter fraud and initiated five lawsuits against the UMWA leaderhsip in federal court.

Jock Yablonski

On the night of December 31, 1969, three men and murdered Yablonski, his wife, and his daughter while they slept in their family home in Pennsylvania. Boyle ordered the killings on December 23, after he and Yablonski got into a screaming match at UMWA headquarters. The UMWA Executive Council embezzled $20,000 from union funds for the job, finding the son-in-law of a minor union official and a couple of drifters to do the job.

The aftermath was a disaster for Boyle and the UMWA. A federal investigation took place, under the auspices of the Secretary of Labor (and future Secretary of State) George Shultz. Boyle soon found himself behind bars for a variety of charges. He was first convicted of embezzling union funds to make illegal campaign contributions in the 1968 elections. While in prison for that, he was convicted of three counts of first-degree murder, receiving three consecutive life sentences as punishment. He died in prison in 1985. Seven other people were convicted of some role in the murders, including the three hit men, as well as UMWA local leaders who arranged for the money laundering.

More importantly, everyday workers were shocked and outraged about their horrible union leadership. A grassroots group arose, Miners for Democracy, in 1970. This group has its roots in the workplace justice black lung movement that Boyle had basically ignored during his leadership, and also included Yablonski’s core supporters, including his sons. Miners for Democracy demanded real accountability to the rank and file. In 1971, the federal government threw out the 1969 election. Miners for Democracy ran a reform slate led by Arnold Miller, a former miner and leader of the black lung movement. Miller defeated Boyle in 1972.

Tony Boyle escorted from the courtroom

This is the first time this series has dealt with a negative action of unions. But in the end, this story is not primarily about union corruption, though it should serve as a warning of such. Rather, it shows how rank and file union members can stand up to bad leadership in their own union. Moreover, it demonstrates the constant need for vigilance against the domination of an international or the AFL-CIO by a single individual. This has remained a problem for unions from the time of Samuel Gompers. John Sweeney was elected on a reform ticket and served as AFL-CIO for nearly 20 years. Richard Trumka, a former UMWA president himself (though he was in college when this all went down), is the current AFL-CIO head and we can only hope he has the good sense to step down after a decade or so, passing the mantle on to a new generation of leadership. Current UMWA head Cecil Roberts has stated that “It opened the union to new voices, new leaders. I’m a product of that; so was Rich Trumka.” I just hope Roberts and Trumka recognize that new voices and new leaders need to be a constant process, not a once in a generation revolution. Roberts has already headed the UMWA for 16 years, the same length of time that Trumka has been in the upper echelons of AFL-CIO leadership.

This series has also covered the Everett Massacre of 1916 and the implementation of NAFTA in 1994.

Cliopatria Award

[ 63 ] January 5, 2012 | Erik Loomis

I am deeply honored to learn that my This Day in Labor History series has won this year’s History News Network Cliopatria Award for “Best Series of Posts.” According to HNN:

In “This Day in Labor History” Erik Loomis of Lawyers, Guns & Money documents significant moments in labor and working class history, moving back through time to slavery and drawing attention to anti-union campaigns in the 20th century. This excellent series highlights labor organizing, strikes, and anti-labor violence with state sponsored union-busting foregrounded. By showcasing the messiness of past labor disputes, Loomis provides case studies to show the rich historical variance of these events and how these “days” shaped later attitudes and policies about American labor. The series is both well-written and provocative.

Last year, the New York Times’ Disunion series won this award.

I am beyond honored to even be considered for such an award, not to mention winning it.

Local Roots

[ 10 ] January 4, 2012 | Erik Loomis

A very nice Washington Post write-up on the great Local Roots, the farmers’ co-op in Wooster, Ohio. I taught at the College of Wooster last year and so spent a good bit of money at this place. It is truly an ideal farmers’ market. The story gets into how it works with local farmers to ensure them a decent profit. This I knew, but not the details. Northeastern Ohio is ideally placed for a small farmers’ market that also serves as a center of the coommunity. First, it is in the middle of farm country. Amish and otherwise, there are thousands of farmers out there. Second, there is nothing else to do in the town. While the college makes a big difference in town life, allowing for a nice wine bar and an acceptable if overpriced steakhouse and regular bar, overall Wooster is a deindustrialized and depressed city. The former home of Rubbermaid (even though the company moved out there is still ad 3 story Rubbermaid store on the downtown square), there is a lot of poverty and the overall air of depression that creates. But this also means that rents are cheap and Local Roots could get a location downtown at what I assume is a very reasonable price.

I remember two things about Local Roots: the apples and the bread. I don’t know how people eat regular apples. Tasteless, covered with wax, totally gross. But even where apples are grown, local apples can be hard to find. Rhode Island for instance has a lot of apple orchards. Go to Whole Foods in Providence though and you have a few pretty good varieties of apples, but all from different parts of country. Nothing from Rhode Island. After the farmers markets close and the apple picking season ends, evidently local apples are impossible to get. Local Roots though had between 5 and 10 different varieties of locally grown apples sold every week, many of which were totally delicious. I actively disliked apples for a long time because it had been so long since I had a really great one. Local Roots totally changed my mind. I have less to say about the bread except that it was really good and not outrageously priced. I didn’t have the money to buy a lot of the cheese and I don’t cook meat, but I understand those were also excellent products. The multicolored popcorn still pops white unfortunately but it was nice to have something other than corn kernels bred to an absurd size.

There’s no good reason why the Local Roots model can’t work around the country. You need a space and connections with local farmers. New York might be hard, but Providence would not be, nor would many major cities. Moreover, in smaller towns, where you really need that local market to serve as an anchor for a community and for downtown retail, it’s a brilliant idea.

Very cool story.

Climate Change: The Real Story

[ 9 ] January 4, 2012 | Erik Loomis

I know we all enjoyed last night’s clown show. But let’s remember that this is a mere midway entertainment compared to the world’s big story: climate change. Maybe the one and only story that really matters if we care about future generations. Everything else is so interconnected with climate change that to ignore it, as we mostly do, is to doom our descendants to lives significantly worse than ours.

Then again, it’s not as if our daily activities have anything to do with the climate or anything…..

Pyramid of Capitalist System

[ 77 ] January 3, 2012 | Erik Loomis

Suffering through the Republican clown show somehow makes me really want to post this 1911 image titled “Pyramid of Capitalist System.”

Clown Show Day

[ 68 ] January 3, 2012 | Erik Loomis

I wish everyone a happy Clown Show Day. The Iowa caucuses have as strong a predictive power for the Republican nomination as I do in the LGM bowl pool. Notable Iowa winners like Mike Huckabee and surprise competitors like Pat Robertson and Pat Buchanan have gone on to have a huge impact on the nomination…. Yet we must take this event VERY SERIOUSLY and members of the media must spend months of their lives talking of nothing else.

As for me, I’m lending my support to noted rounder and 19th century pitching extraordinaire @OldHossRadbourn who is running on the platform:

I support guns, germs, and steel. These things made America great, and we must return to them to restore our grandeur. #VoteRadbourn

It’s hard to distill Republican ideology on foreign policy any purer. As someone who studies the past exclusively to learn how to better oppress people today, this is a candidate I can support!

Border Wall and Animals

[ 37 ] January 3, 2012 | Erik Loomis

While the border wall does virtually nothing to halt human activity on the border and absolutely nothing to limit the drug trade, it does have massive negative impacts on many animals. Given the lack of environmental protection in Mexico, there are several species that may need to continue migrating across the border into the United States in order to survive. According to Defenders of Wildlife, these are the species negatively impacted by the border wall:

Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy Owl
California brown pelican
California least tern
Chiricahua leopard frog
Desert tortoise
Elegant trogan
Flat-tailed horned lizard
Huachuca water umbel
Jaguar
Jaguarundi
Kearny’s Bluestar
Least Bell’s vireo
Lesser long-nosed bat
Light-footed clapper rail
Masked bobwhite quail
Mexican gray wolf
Mexican spotted owl
Ocelot
Sonoran chub
Sonoran pronghorn
Yellow billed cuckoo

It would speak highly of Americans if we didn’t let our racism get in the way of both hurting human beings and dooming other species. Sadly, no.

Via Ralph Maughan.

Museum Review: The New York Historical Society

[ 2 ] January 3, 2012 | Erik Loomis

I was fortunate enough to visit the reopened New York Historical Society just before the holidays. It’s pretty impressive. I’ve visited twice before, once when the old building was partially open and once for a major exhibit during the building’s renovation with the exhibition housed offsite. They do a great job, there’s no question. I am consistently amazed at the artifacts the NYHS has. When I saw the New York during the Civil War exhibit, I was wondering how they managed to find so many mint condition artifacts, including a Lincoln-Hamlin campaign poster. Truly remarkable. The second exhibit I saw was on Latinos in New York before World War II which was also awesome because I knew next to nothing about that topic.

The main exhibit right now is slightly less successful than these two. “Revolution! The Atlantic World Reborn” connects the American, French, and Haitian revolutions to build a transatlantic history, reflecting the current state of transnational scholarship and building important connections between American history and the rest of the world. That’s a great idea. As usual, the curators put together some pretty amazing artifacts. They brought the original Stamp Act from Britain for its first showing outside that nation. Written on parchment, it’s absolutely amazing. I just kind of stared at it for 5 minutes. To build up the Haitian part of the exhibit, they displayed some voodoo costumes, something I certainly had not seen before. The costumes might be from the early 20th century, but they get the point across.

But while still very cool, the exhibit kind of peters out after the American Revolution. The narrative gets a little bit lost between the different revolutions, even though the curators do a good job showing the economic and intellectual connectivity of these places (and in fact, the section at the beginning on the colonial Atlantic world is arguably the exhibit’s strength). Too many artifacts are old books. It’s kind of interesting to see a first edition of Common Sense but there’s only so many old books that are going to add much to the experience. The curators do a heroic job pulling together what they can for the Haitian part of the exhibit, but there’s just not a lot of material to work with given the very few documents that exist. The recently discovered only extant original copy of the Haitian Declaration of Independence (discovered by a graduate student in history no less!) is cool, as is the painting of Haitian revolutionary Jean-Baptiste Belley with a, um, pronounced package clearly painted to express white Europe’s fears of black sexuality.

We were also rushed through the Haitian portion of the exhibit because of a special event on that floor. The staff did not tell us the exhibit was closing early even though we specifically told them that’s why we were visiting. Annoying.

The rest of the museum is also solid, mostly consisting of small exhibits. Highlights include the pistols used in the Hamilton-Burr duel and the displays of random artifacts outside exhibits; I always appreciate the open storage areas. The Brooklyn Museum also does a good job with this. I was particularly enamored with the giant wooden statue of a NYC fire chief from the 1850s; this expression of antebellum heroic masculinity in the urban context was powerful.

Less pleasing was the new movie about New York City’s history meant to introduce us to the topic. Made with massive amounts of money, the 20 minute film skims over the history way too fast, gets to 9/11 about 12 minutes in and follows with 5 minutes of New York narcissism about how great the city is. Given just how much as happened there and the fact that I don’t think tourists go to the New York Historical Society without being already pretty tuned into the city, it was annoying. 20 seconds spent on the Gilded Age versus following a cab around Times Square for 2 minutes. Blech.

My other criticism is fairly minor, but still significant I think. For as awesome as the NYHS collections are and for their very cool exhibits, I wish they realized history took place after 1865. There is at best lip service paid to anything after the Civil War. 1 or 2 of the very small exhibits cover the past 150 years. On October 5 it is opening a major exhibit on World War II in New York City, which will be a refreshing change. Still, as a late 19th and early 20th century, a period of time when New York was probably at its peak of importance in the United States, I get really frustrated to see the period almost totally unrepresented.

Nonetheless, I’d happily return to the museum once a year to see what kind of cool things they are presenting. It’s one of the best history museums in the United States and worth a visit, even for a not fully successful exhibit.

Historical Anti-Labor Quote of the Day

[ 4 ] January 2, 2012 | Erik Loomis

“The earthquake and fire in San Francisco was a terrible blow, but the menace of tyrannical organized labor is a blight and curse from which the city is now staggering and reeling like a drunken man.”

The Timberman, July 1907.

Very classy. Note–The Timberman was the least anti-worker major timber industry journal.

This Day in Labor History: January 1, 1994

[ 30 ] January 1, 2012 | Erik Loomis

On January 1, 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement went into effect. NAFTA intended to bring down trade barriers between Canada, the United States, and Mexico. After a long fight against NAFTA’s passage by labor, environmental groups, Mexican farmers, and many other constituencies, the support of President Bill Clinton clinched its success. Clinton promised that “NAFTA means jobs. American jobs, and good-paying American jobs. If I didn’t believe that, I wouldn’t support this agreement.”

While judging the precise impact of NAFTA itself upon the number of employed Americans is complicated, NAFTA has had a highly negative impact upon high-paying blue-collar union jobs, a very bad environmental record, and did a great deal to spur the migration of Mexican farmers from the countryside and into the United States.

Even since the creation of the Border Industrialization Project in 1965, U.S. firms have had great incentive to move their operations to the Mexican side of the U.S. border. The Mexican government created BIP because it brought jobs to their country. American industry began lobbying the U.S. government to brush aside all barriers to globalization. As Jefferson Cowie shows in his fantastic book Capital Moves, American corporations had never bought into the Grand Bargain of the mid-twentieth century and looked to move away from unionized workplaces as soon as possible. When new factories in the United States, even in the South, proved too open for unionization, opening new factories in Mexico proved irresistible.

The passage of NAFTA allowed the fleeing of American manufacturing to enter its peak phase. Between 1994 and 2010, American trade deficits with Mexico were $97.2 billion, displacing 682,900 jobs. Of those, about 80% were in U.S. manufacturing jobs. Overall, since the passage of NAFTA, the United States has lost 5 million manufacturing jobs. Union membership plummeted. Today, only about 7% of American workers in private companies have union representation. In 1994, that number was 11%, down from 30% in 1965, when the Border Industrialization Project began. Companies used the threat of moving jobs to Mexico to force down wages and suppress unionization campaigns. Fearful of losing their jobs, American workers accepted rollback after rollback, but usually the companies eventually closed their American plants anyway.

NAFTA also spurred the migration of Mexicans into the maquiladoras, the cities, and the United States. While some will argue this is good for Mexicans (though anyone visiting Mexico City or Ciudad Juarez may have trouble making this argument), the reasons for it are really bad. American farm subsidies, a violation of NAFTA in spirit if not in rule, allowed American farm companies to dump commodities on the Mexican market. Soon, Mexican corn farmers could not compete with American corn and lost their land. Since 1994, approximately 1.3 million Mexicans have lose their farms or farm jobs. The states of central Mexico, including Jalisco, Guanajuato and Michoacan, where a huge number of farmers lost their land, have also been the states that have contributed the most migrants to the United States. In 2003, 1/3 of the Mexican migrants residing in the United States came from these states. Numbers of migrants have skyrocketed from the southern state of Oaxaca, largely again with agricultural workers moving north. Were the United States to have included humane immigration laws in NAFTA that might be one thing, but instead we have forced them into the desert to die.

American unions have tried to reach across the border and create transnational alliances between workers. When the textile industry moved en masse to Mexico, unions like UNITE sent delegations of workers to meet maquila workers in Mexico and gave them organizing advice and funds. But the major unions are part of the corporate structure of the Mexican government and have not exercised much if any independent action since the early 20th century. There are independent unions that struggle to survive, but between government discouragement, local intimidation of activists, and the same and worse anti-union activities by employers that you see in the United States, they have had a very difficult time getting off the ground. And the same threats of moving factories if workers form independent unions that provide real representation for labor that worked so well against American workers have been used in Mexico. After all, there are a lot of Hondurans looking for work, not infrequently because they have also lost access to the land and traditional farming economies.

While one may argue that NAFTA and American deindustrialization has created cleaner American environments, the Mexican environment has been severely denuded and degraded, particularly with the dumping of toxic chemicals and other pollutants. American environmental laws of the 1960s and 1970s forced companies to deal with pollutants responsibly. These companies did not see their profits depreciate significantly for this, but maximizing profit took priority to social and environmental responsibility. NAFTA also forced remaining Mexican farmers to depend ever more greatly on agrochemicals with poison both the land and the farmworkers who handle and are sprayed by them in the fields. Although it predates NAFTA, Angus Wright’s The Death of Ramon Gonzalez is a good primer on this issue.

The loss of manufacturing jobs due to NAFTA, other free trade agreements, and globalization more broadly has, I believe, helped contribute to the longevity of the economic downturn and threatens larger problems in the future. The promise of NAFTA was cheap products and information-based jobs that were easier on our bodies and allowed us to use our minds. But those jobs have hardly replaced well-paid manufacturing jobs and have left millions of older and poorly educated (disproportionately people of color) Americans behind. We managed to keep the charade of a successful new economy going for awhile, through the housing bubble and personal debt, but both have busted. Now we don’t know how to put people back to work. We have literally dismantled the infrastructure that would allowed us to put people to work in industrial labor. If the information economy doesn’t work and if there is little to no incentive for industries to open factories (or a government that doesn’t make it a priority), what is the long-term employment solution?

This series has also covered the merger of the AFL and CIO in 1955 and the Homestead Strike of 1892.

Death List ’12

[ 36 ] January 1, 2012 | Erik Loomis

Last year was a tough year for my Death List. Only Andy Rooney died. I’ve replaced him with Phyllis Diller. The rest are the same:

1. Bhumibol Adulyadej, King of Thailand
2. Mike Wallace
3. Margaret Thatcher
4. Rev. Sun Myung Moon
5. Fidel Castro
6. Luis Echeverria
7. Ernest Borgnine
8. Phyllis Diller
9. Clark Terry
10. Little Jimmy Dickens

Let the outrage at my moral turpitude begin.

Essence of Grouse

[ 31 ] December 31, 2011 | Erik Loomis

Here’s another menu from the New York Public Library historical menu collection. This is from the Third Panel Sheriff’s Jury of New York County dinner, February 20, 1900.

I don’t know which soup to choose, the green turtle or the essence of grouse.

The rest of the menu booklet is very exciting, with 2 pages dedicated to the Star-Spangled Banner. Sounds like a fun time….

  • Switch to our mobile site