Take the bribe

I’m perhaps a bit less sanguine than Andrew Smith about the issues underlying Vulcan’s offer to Seattle described here:

The Seattle City Council has quietly shelved a proposal that would let Vulcan, Paul Allen’s real-estate firm, build a trio of 24-story towers near Lake Union if it gave the city a chunk of land to use for affordable housing and social services.

Richard Conlin, who chairs the council’s South Lake Union Committee, said the proposal known as Block 59 is not a priority for other council members and none of them wanted to advance the specific proposal made by Mayor Mike McGinn late last year.

That pitch was separate from the mayor’s less-controversial zoning plan, which would allow taller buildings, some up to 40 stories, in the fast-growing South Lake Union area.

As a general rule, corporations offering bribes in exchange for exemptions from the law is pretty problematic. In this case, though, not only is the bribe of substantial public value, the exception of the corporation is asking for is also clearly in the public interest. SLU is a neighborhood close to the urban core with considerable and growing demand for commercial and residential space (amazon.com’s main campus is nearby), and 65 feet is an absurdly low limit. What makes this decision even more absurd is that Seattle recently built an expensive, underused streetcar connecting SLU to (almost) the downtown core. Seattle’s failure to embrace transit-oriented development, even when bribed to do so by a corporate entity to whom they pretty much never say “no,” continues to be maddeningly counterproductive.

42 comments on this post.
  1. shah8:

    Given the kind of warfare that has gone on in Marin county with the likes of George Lucas and David Lee Hoffman…

    It’s just not surprising at all. People benefit from the artificial limits and they’re tighter with their local politicians than Paul Allen is…

  2. JoyfulA:

    Vulcan? Isn’t that a labor union in the iron and steel industry?

  3. joe from Lowell:

    He’s not like us!

    He’s got green blood!

  4. Steve S.:

    underused streetcar connecting SLU to (almost) the downtown core

    Will I be the first to note that the acronym for this is SLUT?

  5. Auguste:

    Not even close to the first.

  6. Jason:

    Not even close. I’ve heard that South Lake Union Trolley was never an official name for it, but it’s still called the SLUT by some residents and t-shirt vendors.

  7. djw:

    http://ridetheslut.com/

  8. Steve S.:

    I meant the first on this thread.

  9. Jason:

    Oh, then yes!

  10. Dr.KennethNoisewater:

    I’m not gonna lie: I’m pretty disappointed this post isn’t about Vulcan, Paul Allen.

  11. Steve S.:

    A tiny victory but I’ll take it.

  12. Colin Day:

    But if Vulcan wants an exception, as opposed to a repeal on the height limitation, will it try to prevent others from building tall buildings there?

  13. Warren Terra:

    Seattle already had great buses, and was already building a promising regional light-rail system. No-one has ever been able to figure out the purpose of the the streetcar, known as the SLUT (yes, that actually was South Lake Union Transit streetcar’s original official acronym), which manages to combine the high startup costs and low flexibility of rail with most of the traffic vulnerability of buses (it is a street-level streetcar, iirc without physically separated lanes), and which did not at least when created serve a traffic corridor identified as already constituting a heavy transit demand. No-one in the neighborhood seemed to want it, and about the only people who found any use for the SLUT were the local coffee shop selling the T-shirts.

  14. Warren Terra:

    By the way, any post about South Lake Union (and Paul Allen) should probably at least link to some history of the proposed Seattle Commons.

  15. mattH:

    git yer own.

  16. expatchad:

    Never experienced the Mercer Mess, have we?

  17. Linnaeus:

    Just dealt with that this morning (not the first) Lovely, as always.

  18. djw:

    That’s how it works in Seattle. Exceptions are a lot easier to get than sensible zoning changes.

  19. djw:

    Absolutely agreed on the utterly pointless waste that is the SLUT. But

    great buses

    is far too generous, I’m afraid. If you catch me in the right mood, I might go as high as “pretty good.” Between political meddling and “don’t change things if anyone is upset” status quo bias, the bus system is pretty far from being as good as it should be. Between the epic fail of the recent rapid ride launch to more quotidian, everyday failures like the baffling, counterproductive insistence sending the 16 through the Mercer mess, Metro misses too many opportunities to be better, even given current traffic and resource constraints, to be great.

  20. Linnaeus:

    Was just about to say something similar. Good buses, yes. Not great.

  21. expatchad:

    Oh, sorry. Paulogies for thinking you weren’t a native. I fled to SE Asia 3 years ago, but loved living in Seattle-Tacoma for many years. Miss it. Rains a lot here, too, but the Palm trees are great.

  22. expatchad:

    Were, IMHO, better by a lot 25 years ago.

  23. The prophet Nostradumbass:

    There’s Tahoe Area Rapid Transit, known as TART.

  24. Warren Terra:

    To be sure, I last lived in Seattle – and last was a regular bus commuter – fifteen years ago, though I’ve used them to get around on visits quite happily since then.

  25. West of the Cascades:

    Portland: great buses, transit-oriented development, lots of bikes, better than Seattle. Any questions?

  26. AR:

    Good, not great buses at this point. Like a lot of government services it was good during the tech boom but is now showing the wear of a decade of slashed government support, rising costs, and increased demand. Fairless square (a fair free zone in downtown Portland) is long gone, off hour travel to the suburban hubs is not particularly easy, and much of the political attention focuses on street car expansion or expansion of light rail into the southern suburbs (which has produced the most potent issue for Republicans in the area in a decade).

  27. djw:

    I think there’s general agreement that in the 90′s Seattle service, via Metro, got worse as it became more amenable to political meddling, even as regional transit got better, as ST was created and regional bus service suddenly got way better.

  28. RhZ:

    +100

  29. JL:

    The fare-free zone is gone? Jeez, I was there in 11/2011 and the fare-free zone was still there. I didn’t know it was in danger of going away, though I guess I am not surprised.

  30. bobbyp:

    Seattle, an urbanscape with incredible views (stand on the Jose P Rizal bridge on a clear spring night and watch the sun set). Zoning hgts. issues are guaranteed to spill blood. And if the exemption was granted what would all the developers with their shiny new, but much shorter buildings say? Shelving the idea was a wise move.

    But agree, the zoning should change, and most likely will. See this report.

  31. Bill Murray:

    A slut was I ere I saw Tulsa

  32. Hogan:

    Tulsa night life: filth, gin, a slut.

  33. John (not McCain):

    Not like us, but they do have one great office party every seven years. Helps make up for it.

  34. burnspbesq:

    As a semi-regular visitor to Seattle (kid goes to Cornish College), I’m inclined to think that high-density commercial construction in SLU is A Bad Idea. Eventually, the Mercer construction project will be completed and access from the I-5 corridor will be OK, but access to SLU from every other direction will still suck

    Do Seattleotes really want to turn Denny Way into Michigan Avenue?

  35. Linnaeus:

    No “paulogies” (heh!) necessary. I’m not a native Seattleite, actually. I’ve lived here just over 12 years, though.

  36. Linnaeus:

    And to be fair, I try not to be overly critical of Metro, as it’s far, far better than the nearly nonexistent public transit in the area where I grew up.

  37. djw:

    Metro was my only non-walking transportation in Seattle for over a decade, so obviously I didn’t think it was that bad, and compared to most other places it’s very good.

  38. shabadoo:

    One question: if Portland’s transit is so great, why is Seattle’s public transit mode share almost twice that of Portland’s?

  39. djw:

    I find that genuinely surprising.

  40. LeeEsq:

    Portland and Seattle have about the same population but Portland is tens of square miles bigger in areas than Seattle. That means Portland’s density is lower. I’m guessing the lower density makes it easier to drive and find parking and more Portlanders choose to drive as a result.

  41. LeeEsq:

    There might also be an issue of demographics. Portland might have more families with kids and this might lead to more car usage.

  42. Breadbaker:

    It’s a tad narrow for that.

Leave a comment

You must be