Subscribe via RSS Feed

Rick Snyder: Reactionary Politics With the Ethics of a Telemarketing Scam Artist

[ 31 ] December 12, 2012 |

The ol’ bait-and-switch.

And, yes, people who are conned into voting for Republicans because they pretend to be moderates are suckers who shouldn’t be surprised by this, but still.

Share with Sociable

Comments (31)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. c u n d gulag says:

    Even if, giving at least SOME of the Republican politicians credit for intending to try be at least fairly moderate, they have to crank their dial up to “CRAZY!!!”, to please their moronic knuckle-dragging mouth-breathing Evangelical and Bircher bases, or else be primaried and lose their next election.

    Self-preservation is the first rule of politics.

    • CaptBackslap says:

      In this specific case, Dick DeVos and Charles Koch told Snyder they’d support a Teabagger primary challenger if he didn’t sign the bill, and he’s not the kind of dude who would react by telling them to go ahead and suck his ass.

      • If he was willing to give up his job to protect Democratic constituencies, he wouldn’t be a Republican.

        Still, Tea Party seems to pick their primary targets pretty randomly. If they went after all the moderates that’d be one thing, but they don’t. (Snowe and Scott Brown were not targeted in any real way.) If they went after everyone who backed the TARP, that’d be another, but nobody’s been trying to primary Paul Ryan or John Thune. It mostly seems to be targets that they could realistically take down and try to come up with some pretext for doing it, in hopes of freaking everyone out into supporting their preferences. This is the very definition of terrorism, and it’s worked.

  2. patrick II says:

    You can add Mitch Daniels to the list of lying republican campaigners who pushed and signed right-to-work law at his first opportunity.

  3. Murc says:

    To be fair, a lot of people just haven’t kept up with the times. People are busy and have lives.

    My Dad still votes Republican in part because he liked John Chafee. And why shouldn’t he like him? Chafee was a good man, a fine Senator.

    Who has been dead for nearly thirteen years and whose son was basically declared apostate.

    I will note that for a long time it was Democrats who were the beneficiaries of this, as during the 80s and 90s there were a lot of, for lack of a better term, Zell Miller Democrats who were still handing the party victories in places like Tennessee because of inertia.

    • mpowell says:

      There is a lot of truth to this. On the one hand, this is why you vote for politicians based on their party ID and not what they say during campaigns. The party ID tells you a lot more about what they’ll do in office. On the other hand, you have to stay up-to-date on what that party ID means. And a lot of voters are 10-20 years behind the times.

  4. Cols714 says:

    The media generally gives these guys the cover they need. This is what I feared from a Romney presidency.

  5. rea says:

    And note: Michigan voters just turned down a constitutional amendment that would, among other things, forbidden a “right to work” law–but in the context of the governor saying that he didn’t support enacting such a law.

  6. Bitter Scribe says:

    I hope every union member in Michigan who voted Republican because the Democrats are the ni-clang party feels like a schmuck.

    • NonyNony says:

      I hope every union member in Michigan who voted against the constitutional amendment because “teachers are stealing our tax money” feels like a schmuck too.

    • witless chum says:

      That’s not really how it went down. Snyder got elected in 2010 on the Republican ‘boy the economy sucks’ wave. That plus a shit load of gerrymandering and you’ve got right to work laws.

  7. Linnaeus says:

    Frankly, I long suspected that Snyder was the most dangerous of the recent class of Midwestern Republican governors precisely because his image of being a moderate would give him the opportunity to enact what his more brash neighbors like Walker and Kasich could not.

  8. DrDick says:

    To be fair, all Republicans lie about their policies and intentions. They cannot get elected if they tell the truth (as we saw in the last election).

  9. cambio says:

    Maybe some Democrats should campaign as status quo centrists and then govern as leftists. Anyone we can disguise a centrist for 2016 who isn’t actually a centrist? Tom Udall? Linda Sanchez pretending to be her sister?

    • NonyNony says:

      There’s no money in pretending to be a centrist while actually being a leftist.

      There’s a lot of money in pretending to be a centrist while actually being a right-wing nut.

  10. There is less ‘bait and switch’ in Republican campaigns than there is belief among certain voters that the Republicans’ policies will never affect them. It’s all about ‘those people’ and their wretched children. And screw government employees because, like, the DMV, right?

    I don’t believe in heightening the contradictions and I don’t say this just be an ass, but unless and until those loyal Republican voters get well and truly screwed by the people they trusted, they will never abandon their tribal loyalty.

    This week in Michigan, the mask is clearly off. Who is looking? Who is learning?

    The Republicans Want To Shrink Your Paycheck! has to become as widely and deeply believed as The Democrats Want To Take Your Guns!

  11. witless chum says:

    The fucked up thing, also, is that Snyder really is what passes for a moderate Republican. Cares about roads and bridges and such. Is pretty openly holding his nose at the anti-gay and anti-woman parts of the party. The state party establishment’s choice for governor was Pete Hoekstra.

    The moderation is pretty hard to see, but it does exist. My adage of politics (and lots of things) is that things can always get worse.

  12. bradP says:

    You might present President Obama’s support for an individual mandate as an example of the same—given his opposition during the Democratic primaries—but the similarities end there;

    Well, there’s also his waffling position on the drug war, government transparency and whistleblowers, immigration, and his opposition to lobbyists, but I’m sure he’s getting to those.

    And “Its not on my agenda” isn’t exactly a categorical statement of opposition.

    And from Google searches, I’m seeing RTW polling at 50% and above in Michigan. I don’t think its possible for 50% of a population to be extremists.

    • Malaclypse says:

      And from Google searches, I’m seeing RTW polling at 50% and above in Michigan. I don’t think its possible for 50% of a population to be extremists.

      I’m willing to bet that 80% of the population can’t define RTW.

      • bradP says:

        Could be. That would be a pretty major problem in a union-heavy state like Michigan.

      • spencer says:

        Even those who can define it are by and large unlikely to think it through to the point where they see the obvious (to me, anyway) free rider problem.

        • bradP says:

          And the free rider problem laid out in layman’s terms – that unions must represent all employees, while collecting dues from only those who wish to pay – one may be tempted to ask why minority unionism isn’t allowed.

          Its easy to look at this as piling on bad law on to bad law.

          • wengler says:

            ‘Minority unionism’. So the company will collectively bargain with say 14 employees, while the 7 employees who opted out bargain individually.

            Hey, look at who is getting hours. Oh, your break lasted 1 minute too long union member, that looks like a write-up. I could go on…

  13. Woodrow says:

    It’s really a nice and helpful piece of info.
    I am satisfied that you just shared this helpful info with us.
    Please stay us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.