Subscribe via RSS Feed

As an official professor of rhetoric, I really just wish Paul Krugman was a better writer.

[ 46 ] August 13, 2012 | SEK

I mean seriously:

Ryan hasn’t “crunched the numbers”; he has just scribbled some stuff down, without checking at all to see if it makes sense. He asserts that he can cut taxes without net loss of revenue by closing unspecified loopholes; he asserts that he can cut discretionary spending to levels not seen since Calvin Coolidge, without saying how; he asserts that he can convert Medicare to a voucher system, with much lower spending than now projected, without even a hint of how this is supposed to work. This is just a fantasy, not a serious policy proposal …

What Ryan is good at is exploiting the willful gullibility of the Beltway media, using a soft-focus style to play into their desire to have a conservative wonk they can say nice things about. And apparently the trick still works.

I much prefer Bob Odenkirk’s profile of Ryan:

He’s a man of habits, believing that they “simplify life and make room for brainstorms.” A voracious reader of history, he’s been known to clip favorite words from books and eat them. Sometimes he’ll eat whole paragraphs. His New York Public Library card has been permanently revoked.

He doesn’t observe Tuesdays. He wears a watch that he smashed on purpose at exactly twelve o’clock. As a result, scheduling is not his strong suit. He famously missed his own birthday by three months.

He reads the Bible in Aramaic to himself through a bullhorn every night and says it’s the perfect mix of the old and the new.

He has three children by four women whom he has never met. He has adopted a man older than himself whom he has affectionately dubbed Grandbrother and with whom he trades birthday cards three times a year.

Comments (46)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. tomstickler says:

    Yer jokin’, right?

  2. Cody says:

    My uncle is a professor of Rhetoric at KU. I always wondered what that exactly meant. I always just didn’t answer his questions, assuming they were rhetorical questions.

  3. Dana says:

    Is that a candidate bio or a Dos Equis commercial?

    • Vance Maverick says:

      Chuck Norris tribute?

      Krugman is a good writer. But his columns, these days, suffer from a terrible tic of signposting — “I’ll get to that in a minute. But first, …”

      • SEK says:

        You’ll note that as a good editor, I clipped his signposting. I’m actually not as annoyed with signposting as I used to be, mostly because it signifies that someone at least put thought into the structure of what they’d written. So much of what I read now is just painfully disorganized that even when I agree with it, my red pen sits in waiting.

  4. Bill Murray says:

    he asserts that he can convert Medicare to a voucher system, with much lower spending than now projected, without even a hint of how this is supposed to work.

    I thought this was supposed to work by transferring much more/most of the cost to the sick person. Thus becoming a classic case of an SEP. Not a simplified employee pension, nor the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy but somebody else’s problem —

    An SEP is something we can’t see, or don’t see, or our brain doesn’t let us see, because we think that it’s somebody else’s problem…. The brain just edits it out, it’s like a blind spot. If you look at it directly you won’t see it unless you know precisely what it is. Your only hope is to catch it by surprise out of the corner of your eye.

    • ploeg says:

      A voucher system will work by empowering the consumer of medicine to choose whether or not to go ahead with the kidney transplant.

      • rm says:

        This will lead hospitals and doctors to agree that the customer is always right, and to compete for the dollars of kidney-transplant-needing patients.

    • he asserts that he can convert Medicare to a voucher system, with much lower spending than now projected, without even a hint of how this is supposed to work.

      I’ll bet lower taxes are the answer!

    • rea says:

      When you think about it, it’s amazing that the health care and insurance industries aren’t united in hysterical opposition to the Republican plan. The Rs claim that if we go to a voucher system, and then reduce the amount of federal money going into the system, the market will cause health care prices to fall. Now, this is pure fantasy as far as a mechanism goes, but the idea behind all this is that the system won’t break down because the doctors will take less money.

  5. Where’s bradp to assert that Krugman is dishonest because look over there?

  6. Steve says:

    I’m so old I remember when you went to grad school for something completely different from rhetoric.

  7. vacuumslayer says:

    David Cross and now Bob Odenkirk?

    I have subscribed to your newsletter, sir.

  8. vacuumslayer says:

    The entire Ryan family is comprised of creative dynamos. Read what Steve Martin has to say about them:

    “Naturally,” he continued, “the bohemians’ existence thrived on creativity. Early in the morning, Mrs. WilliamsRyan would rise and create breakfast. Then, Mr. Williams Ryan, inspired by his wife’s limitless energy, would rush off to a special room and create tiny hairs in a sink. The children would create things, too. But being temperamental artists, they would often flush them away without a second thought.”

    • Bill Murray says:

      I believe Congressman Ryan also creates little tiny hairs in his sink every morning. Well he first creates them out of his face then they migrate to the sink

  9. Guns says:

    I think we don’t need to criticize some one like this.

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.

  • Switch to our mobile site