Subscribe via RSS Feed

Stop the Censorship!

[ 20 ] February 17, 2012 | Scott Lemieux

Col. Mustard is very impressed with Pat Buchanan’s claims that he has been “censored” and “blacklisted” by liberals who  “stigmatize as racist, homophobic, or anti-Semitic any who contradict what George Orwell once called their ‘smelly little orthodoxies.’”   Damn that radical leftist William F. Buckley, stigmatizing kindly old Pat Buchanan as an anti-Semite merely for saying anti-Semitic things.

Anyway, based on the new conservative orthodoxy that anyone who does not have the well-compensated media sinecure of their choosing is being “censored,” I would like to draw your attention to an even greater outrage.    I have been systematically denied the right to make paid appearances on Fox News or to write op-eds for the Wall Street Journal.   Without a hearing!!!!!!!!   For that matter, I have also never had a paid job with MSNBC.   When will someone stand up for my First Amendment rights against the politically correct censors of the right and left???????

Comments (20)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. 4jkb4ia says:

    I cannot say anything about this other than that he was an embarrassment to the network and should have been gone years ago.

    (I am looking for a Gary Carter post. An actual Montreal sports personality wrote in the NYT that Olympic Stadium was one of the worst ballparks ever.)

  2. 4jkb4ia says:

    And I see that the Mitch Melnick piece has already been linked to.

  3. Uncle Kvetch says:

    You know, I like Rachel Maddow just fine, but it doesn’t speak too well of her that she indulged him as Crazy but Lovable Ol’ Uncle Pat for so long.

  4. david mizner says:

    Sully’s portraying him as a victim as well.

    http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/02/the-hounding-of-pat-buchanan.html

    The idea that he was not the target of much subterranean leftist outrage and pressure to fire him, as my colleague Howie Kurtz reports, seems highly unlikely to me. Yes, as Howie rightly reports, Buchanan’s latest inflammatory book was the casus belli. But Phil Griffin’s views of the book and an underground campaign to fire him from the professional left are not mutually exclusive explanations. I believe Pat on this. The pressure on MSNBC management to get rid of this fly in their propagandistic ointment must have been intense – and came in part from two of the more pernicious liberal interest groups in DC, the Gay Human Rights Campaign and the ADL.

    • efgoldman says:

      Sully becomes more out of touch by the week. Elsewhere. he called Sieg Heil Pat an “intellectual”.

    • Warren Terra says:

      Sully has a vested interest in people not being blackballed because of outrage over racist books they’re written (Buchanan) or enthusiastically and consistently promoted (Sullivan, The Bell Curve

    • commie atheist says:

      subterranean leftist outrage

      I liked Dylan’s version better.

    • Warren Terra says:

      Still haven’t looked at Sully’s site, but John Cole has another pullquote from Sully:

      There is so much I disagree with Pat Buchanan on – from World War II to marriage equality to immigration to my love of a multi-racial and multi-cultural society – that I could write a book in it. But let me say something in his defense: however repellent some of his views, he is intellectually honest. Yes, publicly bigoted, sometimes outrageous, a flame-thrower, a reactionary who flirted at times with what only can be called neo-fascism.

      I ask you: in what way is Sully’s passage different from this:

      I mean, say what you like about the tenets of National Socialism, Dude, at least it’s an ethos.

      Sully seems to realize that Buchanan is objectively repulsive scum – but he’s intellectually honest. Which apparently covers a multitude of sins.

      • R Johnston says:

        After his Ron Paul debacle, Sully needs to go there. Gotta be consistent, after all.

      • commie atheist says:

        An intellectually honest repulsive scumbag is currently the leading candidate for President in the GOP primary. So, yeah, it’s definitely an ethos.

        • mds says:

          An intellectual honest repulsive scumbag who would take from other women the choice of his own wife to terminate a pregnancy is currently the leading candidate for President in the GOP primary.

          Fixed that for you to add the heaping helping of intellectually dishonest hypocrisy shit topping. If you want personally and professionally dishonest, there’s always the lobbying, the “tort reform for thee but not for me” incident, the conscious defrauding of Pennsylvania taxpayers to cover his children’s educational costs in another state, etc. Just to clarify that no matter how much he squeals about what a friend Jesus has in him, he’s still a thief and a liar.

  5. efgoldman says:

    Well, Scott, maybe Baseball Digest will give you a place…

  6. Jim Lynch says:

    For a percentage of your future earnings, I’m prepared to stand up for your rights.

  7. DrDick says:

    Funny how conservatives are all for the “free markets” and rights of corporations to do as they please until they turn around and bite them.

  8. TMG says:

    Lest we forget – in 1989, Buchanan was more sympathetic to the notion of punishing blasphemy than to protecting Rushdie’s life.

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.

  • blogroll

  • Brad Delong
  • Crooked Timber
  • Daily Kos
  • Danger Room
  • Eschaton
  • Ezra Klein
  • Feministe
  • Talking Points Memo
  • Feministing
  • Glenn Greenwald
  • Juan Cole
  • Monkey Cage
  • Switch to our mobile site