Dan Hopkins asks some questions about third party advocacy. For my part, I wouldn't say that I'm so much against the idea of a third party as skeptical on both.
I'm pretty much where my fellow Mittens skeptic Jon Chait is. I still don't think my analysis of Romney's fundamental vulnerabilities was wrong; it's still amazing that someone who lost.
It cannot be pointed out often enough that there wasn't one. The (too-small) federal stimulus was cancelled out by 50 little Hoovers.
1991 would like its lame racist College Republican gimmick back.
I assume that most interested parties are already reading Paul's other blog, but this gem he unearthed from Ken Gormley's shameless op-ed in defense of contemporary legal education is too.
Another reminder.
I don't often talk about individual historians because most of you won't care, but it's worth noting the death of Oscar Handlin, a historian who did more than anyone to.
isn't happening. I, for one, am shocked.
