<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is wrong with these people?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/07/what-is-wrong-with-these-people/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/07/what-is-wrong-with-these-people</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jackd</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/07/what-is-wrong-with-these-people/comment-page-1#comment-57389</link>
		<dc:creator>jackd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=14131#comment-57389</guid>
		<description>In related news, Thomas Sowell&#039;s column this week talks about how awful the NAACP is for calling the Tea Party racists and how terrible Obama is on race, but somehow never gets around to saying anything about the Sherrod case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In related news, Thomas Sowell&#8217;s column this week talks about how awful the NAACP is for calling the Tea Party racists and how terrible Obama is on race, but somehow never gets around to saying anything about the Sherrod case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Settle In Kids, We&#8217;re In For Another Sherrod-y Week &#171; Around The Sphere</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/07/what-is-wrong-with-these-people/comment-page-1#comment-57270</link>
		<dc:creator>Settle In Kids, We&#8217;re In For Another Sherrod-y Week &#171; Around The Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=14131#comment-57270</guid>
		<description>[...] Paul Campos: It’s hard to understand how this kind of thing gets published in a world that includes editors, higher cognitive function, and/or common decency. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paul Campos: It’s hard to understand how this kind of thing gets published in a world that includes editors, higher cognitive function, and/or common decency. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snuh</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/07/what-is-wrong-with-these-people/comment-page-1#comment-57208</link>
		<dc:creator>snuh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=14131#comment-57208</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;In other words, the Supreme Court of the United States, with the basic facts of the case agreed to by all nine Justices in Screws vs. the U.S. Government, says not one word about Bobby Hall being lynched. Why? Because it never happened.&lt;/i&gt;

when the supreme court doesn&#039;t express an opinion about something one way or the other, it never happened.  his logic is watertight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In other words, the Supreme Court of the United States, with the basic facts of the case agreed to by all nine Justices in Screws vs. the U.S. Government, says not one word about Bobby Hall being lynched. Why? Because it never happened.</i></p>
<p>when the supreme court doesn&#8217;t express an opinion about something one way or the other, it never happened.  his logic is watertight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Substance McGravitas</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/07/what-is-wrong-with-these-people/comment-page-1#comment-57188</link>
		<dc:creator>Substance McGravitas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=14131#comment-57188</guid>
		<description>I dunno if I&#039;m late to this and maybe something&#039;s changed, but the RSS feeds are currently free of ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno if I&#8217;m late to this and maybe something&#8217;s changed, but the RSS feeds are currently free of ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theo</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/07/what-is-wrong-with-these-people/comment-page-1#comment-57146</link>
		<dc:creator>Theo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=14131#comment-57146</guid>
		<description>Unrelated: Did you know that the program you use to generate your RSS feed includes ads at the bottom of each article, without (I hope) your editorial oversight?  On this article, I got an ad for &quot;AfroRomance&quot;, which is probably what it says (a singles site) but looks like it could also be a prostitution site.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://math.berkeley.edu/~theojf/advertisement1.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Screen shot 1&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://math.berkeley.edu/~theojf/advertisement2.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Just the ad&lt;/a&gt;.  I wonder if the word &quot;lynching&quot; is what picked this one.

LGM is probably sufficiently monetized that you are not eager to reduce the amount of advertising on your RSS feed.  But, while I am thrilled with the content here, I am not thrilled with such ads (I have also seen problematic drug ads), and may unsubscribe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unrelated: Did you know that the program you use to generate your RSS feed includes ads at the bottom of each article, without (I hope) your editorial oversight?  On this article, I got an ad for &#8220;AfroRomance&#8221;, which is probably what it says (a singles site) but looks like it could also be a prostitution site.  <a href="http://math.berkeley.edu/~theojf/advertisement1.png" rel="nofollow">Screen shot 1</a>.  <a href="http://math.berkeley.edu/~theojf/advertisement2.png" rel="nofollow">Just the ad</a>.  I wonder if the word &#8220;lynching&#8221; is what picked this one.</p>
<p>LGM is probably sufficiently monetized that you are not eager to reduce the amount of advertising on your RSS feed.  But, while I am thrilled with the content here, I am not thrilled with such ads (I have also seen problematic drug ads), and may unsubscribe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elm</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/07/what-is-wrong-with-these-people/comment-page-1#comment-57128</link>
		<dc:creator>elm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=14131#comment-57128</guid>
		<description>Well, yes, I can imagine that many people do equate lynching with hanging.  But if you&#039;re going to accuse someone of lying when they say someone was lynched, you better make darn sure that the word means what you think it means and not what they think it means.  (Or see if it might mean both.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yes, I can imagine that many people do equate lynching with hanging.  But if you&#8217;re going to accuse someone of lying when they say someone was lynched, you better make darn sure that the word means what you think it means and not what they think it means.  (Or see if it might mean both.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c u n d gulag</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/07/what-is-wrong-with-these-people/comment-page-1#comment-57115</link>
		<dc:creator>c u n d gulag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=14131#comment-57115</guid>
		<description>Good point.  However, when &quot;Mad Magazine&quot; has higher editorial standards than &quot;The Spectatory,&quot; we really need to revamp media.  FAST!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.  However, when &#8220;Mad Magazine&#8221; has higher editorial standards than &#8220;The Spectatory,&#8221; we really need to revamp media.  FAST!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hogan</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/07/what-is-wrong-with-these-people/comment-page-1#comment-57101</link>
		<dc:creator>Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=14131#comment-57101</guid>
		<description>R. Emmett Tyrell? Well that just, um, reinforces my point. Yeah, that&#039;s it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R. Emmett Tyrell? Well that just, um, reinforces my point. Yeah, that&#8217;s it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBL</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/07/what-is-wrong-with-these-people/comment-page-1#comment-57091</link>
		<dc:creator>JBL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=14131#comment-57091</guid>
		<description>This is the American Spectator, not the Weekly Standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the American Spectator, not the Weekly Standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

