<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Case For Diane Wood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/the-case-for-diane-wood/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/the-case-for-diane-wood</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Follow-up on Supreme Court selection process</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/the-case-for-diane-wood/comment-page-1#comment-68965</link>
		<dc:creator>Follow-up on Supreme Court selection process</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=7216#comment-68965</guid>
		<description>[...] Lemeiux today publishes his excellent &#8220;Case for Diane&#160;Wood.&#8221;&#160; Scott says that his piece was originally meant to be published in The American Prospect, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lemeiux today publishes his excellent &#8220;Case for Diane&#160;Wood.&#8221;&#160; Scott says that his piece was originally meant to be published in The American Prospect, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmartRemarks » Obama&#8217;s Supreme Court: still drifting to the right</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/the-case-for-diane-wood/comment-page-1#comment-45713</link>
		<dc:creator>SmartRemarks » Obama&#8217;s Supreme Court: still drifting to the right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 22:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=7216#comment-45713</guid>
		<description>[...] progressive, a Pamela Karlan or Harold Koh or Erwin Chemerinksy, or even actual short-lister Diane Wood, it could have served a meaningful purpose. Any of those (among others) would be a nominee the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] progressive, a Pamela Karlan or Harold Koh or Erwin Chemerinksy, or even actual short-lister Diane Wood, it could have served a meaningful purpose. Any of those (among others) would be a nominee the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevens Retiring</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/the-case-for-diane-wood/comment-page-1#comment-45596</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevens Retiring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=7216#comment-45596</guid>
		<description>[...] limited political experience, and no record of influential scholarship -- is a better choice than Diane Wood or Sidney Thomas, because the proposition is pretty much indefensible. When you&#039;re reduced to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] limited political experience, and no record of influential scholarship &#8212; is a better choice than Diane Wood or Sidney Thomas, because the proposition is pretty much indefensible. When you&#39;re reduced to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elena Kagan &#8211; The Good, Bad and the Subjective &#171; The Long Goodbye</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/the-case-for-diane-wood/comment-page-1#comment-45565</link>
		<dc:creator>Elena Kagan &#8211; The Good, Bad and the Subjective &#171; The Long Goodbye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 16:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=7216#comment-45565</guid>
		<description>[...] 9750 Words on Elena Kagan &#8211; More than you ever wanted to know. From the SCOTUS Blog. The title is a bit exaggerated, you&#8217;ll have to click through and read Kagan&#8217;s published work to get a real sense of her legal point of view. Executive authority has expanded directly and by way of presidential directed agencies over the last 25 years. Kagan thought that Clinton&#8217;s expansion were justified in the sense of regulatory power to protect the nation and consumers when pressing issues were not properly handled or expedited by Congress. Not a bad thing some liberals might think on first impression, but a tack that can be abused &#8211; see Bush, John Yoo, David Addington, the DOJ under Gonzales and the abuses by the CIA as directed by the White House. I would have rather done a post celebrating the nomination of Judge Diane Wood (7th Cir.). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 9750 Words on Elena Kagan &#8211; More than you ever wanted to know. From the SCOTUS Blog. The title is a bit exaggerated, you&#8217;ll have to click through and read Kagan&#8217;s published work to get a real sense of her legal point of view. Executive authority has expanded directly and by way of presidential directed agencies over the last 25 years. Kagan thought that Clinton&#8217;s expansion were justified in the sense of regulatory power to protect the nation and consumers when pressing issues were not properly handled or expedited by Congress. Not a bad thing some liberals might think on first impression, but a tack that can be abused &#8211; see Bush, John Yoo, David Addington, the DOJ under Gonzales and the abuses by the CIA as directed by the White House. I would have rather done a post celebrating the nomination of Judge Diane Wood (7th Cir.). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whiff : Lawyers, Guns &#38; Money</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/the-case-for-diane-wood/comment-page-1#comment-45400</link>
		<dc:creator>Whiff : Lawyers, Guns &#38; Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 04:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=7216#comment-45400</guid>
		<description>[...] political experience, and no record of influential scholarship &#8212; is a better choice than Diane Wood or Sidney Thomas, because the proposition is pretty much indefensible.   When you&#8217;re [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] political experience, and no record of influential scholarship &#8212; is a better choice than Diane Wood or Sidney Thomas, because the proposition is pretty much indefensible.   When you&#8217;re [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinah Bee Menil</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/the-case-for-diane-wood/comment-page-1#comment-43636</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinah Bee Menil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=7216#comment-43636</guid>
		<description>Nice site, very informative. I like to read this.,it is very helpful in my part for my &lt;a href=&quot;http://elegalsite.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; criminal law&lt;/a&gt; studies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice site, very informative. I like to read this.,it is very helpful in my part for my <a href="http://elegalsite.com/" rel="nofollow"> criminal law</a> studies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/the-case-for-diane-wood/comment-page-1#comment-42927</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 19:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=7216#comment-42927</guid>
		<description>Yeah, you&#039;ll have to search the archives for by discussion of this, but your argument only makes sense if judging at the Supreme Court level is just a matter of mechanical technical expertise, and since that&#039;s transparently silly there&#039;s not much to engage with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, you&#8217;ll have to search the archives for by discussion of this, but your argument only makes sense if judging at the Supreme Court level is just a matter of mechanical technical expertise, and since that&#8217;s transparently silly there&#8217;s not much to engage with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jotman</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/the-case-for-diane-wood/comment-page-1#comment-42923</link>
		<dc:creator>Jotman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=7216#comment-42923</guid>
		<description>You forgot to mention one other significant point. Wood&#039;s  major career passion is for law, not administration duties, coffee machines, and fund raising:

http://jotman.blogspot.com/2010/04/does-dean-position-qualify-elena-kagan.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot to mention one other significant point. Wood&#8217;s  major career passion is for law, not administration duties, coffee machines, and fund raising:</p>
<p><a href="http://jotman.blogspot.com/2010/04/does-dean-position-qualify-elena-kagan.html" rel="nofollow">http://jotman.blogspot.com/2010/04/does-dean-position-qualify-elena-kagan.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verities and Vagaries &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Diane Wood -</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/the-case-for-diane-wood/comment-page-1#comment-42904</link>
		<dc:creator>Verities and Vagaries &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Diane Wood -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=7216#comment-42904</guid>
		<description>[...] Lemieux chimes in with more here, writing that &#8220;Judge Wood would bring both sterling credentials and the judicial philosophy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lemieux chimes in with more here, writing that &#8220;Judge Wood would bring both sterling credentials and the judicial philosophy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

