<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Precision Targeting At Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/precision-targeting-at-work/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/precision-targeting-at-work</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tai Troesch</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/precision-targeting-at-work/comment-page-1#comment-66442</link>
		<dc:creator>Tai Troesch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 22:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6860#comment-66442</guid>
		<description>Hi Nice site Really enjoyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nice site Really enjoyed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Plot Thickens. : Lawyers, Guns &#38; Money</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/precision-targeting-at-work/comment-page-1#comment-50076</link>
		<dc:creator>The Plot Thickens. : Lawyers, Guns &#38; Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6860#comment-50076</guid>
		<description>[...] US intelligence analyst who leaked the footage that resulted in Wikileaks&#8217; infamous &#8220;Collateral Murder&#8221; video has been outed by a hacker to whom he boasted of his actions online, and arrested by the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] US intelligence analyst who leaked the footage that resulted in Wikileaks&#8217; infamous &#8220;Collateral Murder&#8221; video has been outed by a hacker to whom he boasted of his actions online, and arrested by the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your laptop&#39;s battery care &#124; Drama Forum &#124; battery</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/precision-targeting-at-work/comment-page-1#comment-40490</link>
		<dc:creator>Your laptop&#39;s battery care &#124; Drama Forum &#124; battery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6860#comment-40490</guid>
		<description>[...] Precision Targeting At Work : Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Precision Targeting At Work : Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/precision-targeting-at-work/comment-page-1#comment-40443</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 05:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6860#comment-40443</guid>
		<description>Correct.  AKs are clearly visible of you look closely.  I missed them the first time as well, absolutely influenced by Wklks&#039; incomplete labeling.  Presence of cameras DNE absence of small arms.  I am not informed enough to comment, however, on resulting implications of mere presence of small arms for satisfaction of ROEs or indeed the legality of engagement (real question for int&#039;l lawyers: are those 2 &lt;em&gt;in fact&lt;/em&gt; identical?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct.  AKs are clearly visible of you look closely.  I missed them the first time as well, absolutely influenced by Wklks&#8217; incomplete labeling.  Presence of cameras DNE absence of small arms.  I am not informed enough to comment, however, on resulting implications of mere presence of small arms for satisfaction of ROEs or indeed the legality of engagement (real question for int&#8217;l lawyers: are those 2 <em>in fact</em> identical?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/precision-targeting-at-work/comment-page-1#comment-40442</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 04:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6860#comment-40442</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I guess my point is that this is what happens in urban, non-conventional warfare. It’s not clean, it’s not surgical, and it’s generally a losing game for the side represented by the guys in the Apache. How many of them come home fine after that? How many more people do they leave behind desperate to kill some Americans after that?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A losing game for the side represented by the guys in the Apache?  For each one of them that come home with PTSD, how many more people did they leave behind dead?  More importantly, assuming they were not 100% accurate in their judgement and shooting, how many innocent lives did they leave behind, either dead, wounded, or without family (and with many of the same PTSD symptoms but not the same support structure you have here in the states).  I&#039;d say there are no &quot;winning&quot; sides here, but if there was a clear loser it ain&#039;t us simply because our &quot;it hurt us to drop tohse bombs on the children&quot;.  I agree with you regarding how many people they leave behind now bloodthristy for revenge though.  Except most of them will lose too, the day they pick up a weapon to fight back in the name of lost loved ones (not implying all enemy fighters are in it because they lost family to American forces, but I can only assume that many are)... and so goes the cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I guess my point is that this is what happens in urban, non-conventional warfare. It’s not clean, it’s not surgical, and it’s generally a losing game for the side represented by the guys in the Apache. How many of them come home fine after that? How many more people do they leave behind desperate to kill some Americans after that?</p></blockquote>
<p>A losing game for the side represented by the guys in the Apache?  For each one of them that come home with PTSD, how many more people did they leave behind dead?  More importantly, assuming they were not 100% accurate in their judgement and shooting, how many innocent lives did they leave behind, either dead, wounded, or without family (and with many of the same PTSD symptoms but not the same support structure you have here in the states).  I&#8217;d say there are no &#8220;winning&#8221; sides here, but if there was a clear loser it ain&#8217;t us simply because our &#8220;it hurt us to drop tohse bombs on the children&#8221;.  I agree with you regarding how many people they leave behind now bloodthristy for revenge though.  Except most of them will lose too, the day they pick up a weapon to fight back in the name of lost loved ones (not implying all enemy fighters are in it because they lost family to American forces, but I can only assume that many are)&#8230; and so goes the cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/precision-targeting-at-work/comment-page-1#comment-40436</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 04:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6860#comment-40436</guid>
		<description>This.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lose Weight Tips- 4 Steps to a Slimmer, Sleeker You &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/precision-targeting-at-work/comment-page-1#comment-40421</link>
		<dc:creator>Lose Weight Tips- 4 Steps to a Slimmer, Sleeker You &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6860#comment-40421</guid>
		<description>[...] Precision Targeting At Work : Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Precision Targeting At Work : Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advice on Business Opportunities for Stay at Home and New Moms? &#124; Com-Rich.com</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/precision-targeting-at-work/comment-page-1#comment-40414</link>
		<dc:creator>Advice on Business Opportunities for Stay at Home and New Moms? &#124; Com-Rich.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6860#comment-40414</guid>
		<description>[...] Precision Targeting At Work : Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Precision Targeting At Work : Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tenting in Style</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/precision-targeting-at-work/comment-page-1#comment-40408</link>
		<dc:creator>Tenting in Style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6860#comment-40408</guid>
		<description>[...] Precision Targeting At Work : Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Precision Targeting At Work : Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

