<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will the Supreme Court Strike Down Health Care Reform?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/will-the-supreme-court-strike-down-health-care-reform/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/will-the-supreme-court-strike-down-health-care-reform</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:55:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: wengler</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/will-the-supreme-court-strike-down-health-care-reform/comment-page-1#comment-37516</link>
		<dc:creator>wengler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6227#comment-37516</guid>
		<description>This discomfort doesn&#039;t seem to apply to determining Presidential elections. Why would it apply to an industry that makes up to a fifth of the economy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This discomfort doesn&#8217;t seem to apply to determining Presidential elections. Why would it apply to an industry that makes up to a fifth of the economy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jron</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/will-the-supreme-court-strike-down-health-care-reform/comment-page-1#comment-37431</link>
		<dc:creator>jron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6227#comment-37431</guid>
		<description>I think four of these justices would have no problem voting against the elected branch&#039;s top priority.  That&#039;s where the WH&#039;s pushback on the court right now makes sense.

They may need the public pressure to start now, to keep the others (read: Kennedy) uncomfortable with the idea of the Court simply being a second-chance legislature for Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think four of these justices would have no problem voting against the elected branch&#8217;s top priority.  That&#8217;s where the WH&#8217;s pushback on the court right now makes sense.</p>
<p>They may need the public pressure to start now, to keep the others (read: Kennedy) uncomfortable with the idea of the Court simply being a second-chance legislature for Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Select Links While I&#8217;m Away (Part 2) &#171; Gerry Canavan</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/will-the-supreme-court-strike-down-health-care-reform/comment-page-1#comment-37427</link>
		<dc:creator>Select Links While I&#8217;m Away (Part 2) &#171; Gerry Canavan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6227#comment-37427</guid>
		<description>[...] Will the Supreme Court strike down health care reform? Probably not. Jon Chait, however, points to another reason to worry: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Will the Supreme Court strike down health care reform? Probably not. Jon Chait, however, points to another reason to worry: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bay of arizona</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/will-the-supreme-court-strike-down-health-care-reform/comment-page-1#comment-37413</link>
		<dc:creator>bay of arizona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6227#comment-37413</guid>
		<description>I assume you are talking about the guns near schools case and Virgina v Morrison. I seriously doubt that even this court would fuck with the #1 priority of the elected branches.

BTW, the new site is fucking slow (unless its just me)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume you are talking about the guns near schools case and Virgina v Morrison. I seriously doubt that even this court would fuck with the #1 priority of the elected branches.</p>
<p>BTW, the new site is fucking slow (unless its just me)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeJ</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/will-the-supreme-court-strike-down-health-care-reform/comment-page-1#comment-37404</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6227#comment-37404</guid>
		<description>Appointing twenty new judges to the court ought to take care of any problems the current court wants to cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appointing twenty new judges to the court ought to take care of any problems the current court wants to cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/will-the-supreme-court-strike-down-health-care-reform/comment-page-1#comment-37396</link>
		<dc:creator>E L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6227#comment-37396</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rather, it’s that a Court that would strike down health care reform would have continued to strike down more and more important legislation.&quot; For God&#039;s sake, don&#039;t tempt them. As Oscar Wilde said: &quot;I can resist anything but temptation.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rather, it’s that a Court that would strike down health care reform would have continued to strike down more and more important legislation.&#8221; For God&#8217;s sake, don&#8217;t tempt them. As Oscar Wilde said: &#8220;I can resist anything but temptation.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/will-the-supreme-court-strike-down-health-care-reform/comment-page-1#comment-37371</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6227#comment-37371</guid>
		<description>I guess the advantage to democrat&#039;s dragging their feet and the process taking a year is that there is no doubt that it has been hashed out by the representatives of the people for all to see.  The Citizens United case may be even more important, but certainly not as well known.  If they struck down heath care after all of this political wrangling the political repercussions would be very high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the advantage to democrat&#8217;s dragging their feet and the process taking a year is that there is no doubt that it has been hashed out by the representatives of the people for all to see.  The Citizens United case may be even more important, but certainly not as well known.  If they struck down heath care after all of this political wrangling the political repercussions would be very high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Maloney</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/will-the-supreme-court-strike-down-health-care-reform/comment-page-1#comment-37369</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Maloney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6227#comment-37369</guid>
		<description>Well, maybe. On the other hand I think there&#039;s a danger in underestimating the degree to which this Court is willing to cast aside precedent and prestige to reach any nakedly partisan result they may desire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, maybe. On the other hand I think there&#8217;s a danger in underestimating the degree to which this Court is willing to cast aside precedent and prestige to reach any nakedly partisan result they may desire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis X. Machina</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/will-the-supreme-court-strike-down-health-care-reform/comment-page-1#comment-37368</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis X. Machina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6227#comment-37368</guid>
		<description>Jack Balkin was on this a while ago....

&lt;A&gt;An anthology&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack Balkin was on this a while ago&#8230;.</p>
<p><a>An anthology</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

