Comments on: USAF Strategists: US Should Drastically and Unilaterally Reduce Nuclear Arsenal http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/usaf-col-salzman-us-should-drastically-and-unilaterally-reduce-nuclear-arsenal Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:14:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: rea http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/usaf-col-salzman-us-should-drastically-and-unilaterally-reduce-nuclear-arsenal/comment-page-1#comment-37251 rea Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:22:11 +0000 http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6181#comment-37251 I don't know if it would be wise to reduce our penis size like this. People would begin questioning our masculinity. I don’t know if it would be wise to reduce our penis size like this. People would begin questioning our masculinity.

]]> By: NBarnes http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/usaf-col-salzman-us-should-drastically-and-unilaterally-reduce-nuclear-arsenal/comment-page-1#comment-37249 NBarnes Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:11:47 +0000 http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6181#comment-37249 The USAF's official position is that the USA's nuclear deterrent isn't negatively affected by reducing our ability to reduce the planet to a cinder merely twice over instead of four times over? How dangerously sane. The opposition of the Republican party can be taken for granted. I look forward to argument-free assertions by the usual suspects that Obama wanted to leave us vulnerable to blah blah by reducing our nuclear arsenal so that we can't blah blah blah and then the terrorists win. The USAF’s official position is that the USA’s nuclear deterrent isn’t negatively affected by reducing our ability to reduce the planet to a cinder merely twice over instead of four times over?

How dangerously sane. The opposition of the Republican party can be taken for granted. I look forward to argument-free assertions by the usual suspects that Obama wanted to leave us vulnerable to blah blah by reducing our nuclear arsenal so that we can’t blah blah blah and then the terrorists win.

]]>