<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frivolous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/frivolous/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/frivolous</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hogan</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/frivolous/comment-page-1#comment-39419</link>
		<dc:creator>Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6739#comment-39419</guid>
		<description>Or even an entire public program that provides medical insurance to poor people! There&#039;s a thought. We could call it . . . MedicHelp? MedicAssistance? Something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or even an entire public program that provides medical insurance to poor people! There&#8217;s a thought. We could call it . . . MedicHelp? MedicAssistance? Something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iLarynx</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/frivolous/comment-page-1#comment-39403</link>
		<dc:creator>iLarynx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6739#comment-39403</guid>
		<description>Re: Article 1, Section 8:

Read the whole paragraph to see how baseless the &quot;uniformity of taxes&quot; claim is - 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Section. 8.&lt;/a&gt;

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Note that the specific Congressional powers stated in this paragraph are:
To lay and collect Taxes
To lay and collect Duties 
To lay and collect Imposts and Excises

Note also, that the specific requirements for uniformity are applied to:
Duties
Imposts and Excises

Notice something missing? That&#039;s right. Taxes are stated as being w/in the powers of Congress, while they are specifically and intentionally omitted from the requirement of uniformity. 

The &quot;uniformity of taxes&quot; claim is completely bogus, from a Constitutional perspective. 

One important point the wing-nuts always avoid is that one of the things this section says is:

&lt;strong&gt;The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes... to pay the Debts and provide for the... general Welfare of the United States.&lt;/strong&gt;
[and later in the same section]
&lt;strong&gt;[The Congress shall have Power] To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://archives.gov/exhibits/charters/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;READ IT&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Article 1, Section 8:</p>
<p>Read the whole paragraph to see how baseless the &#8220;uniformity of taxes&#8221; claim is &#8211; </p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html" rel="nofollow">Section. 8.</a></p>
<p>The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;</p></blockquote>
<p>Note that the specific Congressional powers stated in this paragraph are:<br />
To lay and collect Taxes<br />
To lay and collect Duties<br />
To lay and collect Imposts and Excises</p>
<p>Note also, that the specific requirements for uniformity are applied to:<br />
Duties<br />
Imposts and Excises</p>
<p>Notice something missing? That&#8217;s right. Taxes are stated as being w/in the powers of Congress, while they are specifically and intentionally omitted from the requirement of uniformity. </p>
<p>The &#8220;uniformity of taxes&#8221; claim is completely bogus, from a Constitutional perspective. </p>
<p>One important point the wing-nuts always avoid is that one of the things this section says is:</p>
<p><strong>The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes&#8230; to pay the Debts and provide for the&#8230; general Welfare of the United States.</strong><br />
[and later in the same section]<br />
<strong>[The Congress shall have Power] To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://archives.gov/exhibits/charters/" rel="nofollow">READ IT</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hogan</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/frivolous/comment-page-1#comment-39388</link>
		<dc:creator>Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6739#comment-39388</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;So, when you force the poor into buying insurance….and they don’t….you charge them tax.&lt;/em&gt;

I know, it&#039;s ridiculous. If only the new law provided some kind of, I don&#039;t know, subsidies maybe? So that poor people could afford insurance? That would have been such a good idea. Stoopid Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>So, when you force the poor into buying insurance….and they don’t….you charge them tax.</em></p>
<p>I know, it&#8217;s ridiculous. If only the new law provided some kind of, I don&#8217;t know, subsidies maybe? So that poor people could afford insurance? That would have been such a good idea. Stoopid Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;A constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory.&#8221; : Lawyers, Guns &#38; Money</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/frivolous/comment-page-1#comment-39364</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;A constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory.&#8221; : Lawyers, Guns &#38; Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6739#comment-39364</guid>
		<description>[...] Death asks:  If the courts rule that the federal government can force you to buy a product produced by a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Death asks:  If the courts rule that the federal government can force you to buy a product produced by a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WrongfulDeath</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/frivolous/comment-page-1#comment-39334</link>
		<dc:creator>WrongfulDeath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6739#comment-39334</guid>
		<description>Another interesting issue about this is that the poor are generally the ones that are currently doing without insurance now.

So, when you force the poor into buying insurance....and they don&#039;t....you charge them tax.

The lower half of income earners pay less than 3% of the tax burden now with many of them paying nothing. So, how will you collect from them? What if they don&#039;t pay? Are you willing to jail them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another interesting issue about this is that the poor are generally the ones that are currently doing without insurance now.</p>
<p>So, when you force the poor into buying insurance&#8230;.and they don&#8217;t&#8230;.you charge them tax.</p>
<p>The lower half of income earners pay less than 3% of the tax burden now with many of them paying nothing. So, how will you collect from them? What if they don&#8217;t pay? Are you willing to jail them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WrongfulDeath</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/frivolous/comment-page-1#comment-39333</link>
		<dc:creator>WrongfulDeath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6739#comment-39333</guid>
		<description>If the courst rule that the federal government can force you to buy a product produced by a private company or pay a punitive tax, then why can&#039;t the federal government force you to buy a Chevy from them? What&#039;s to stop them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the courst rule that the federal government can force you to buy a product produced by a private company or pay a punitive tax, then why can&#8217;t the federal government force you to buy a Chevy from them? What&#8217;s to stop them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Investing Money To Aid One&#8217;s Future &#124; E7News.com</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/frivolous/comment-page-1#comment-39285</link>
		<dc:creator>Investing Money To Aid One&#8217;s Future &#124; E7News.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6739#comment-39285</guid>
		<description>[...] Frivolous : Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Frivolous : Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poll: I got the red rings of death, should I just sell all my Xbox games and get a PS3 or just get it repaired? &#124; XBox 360 Fix Red</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/frivolous/comment-page-1#comment-39256</link>
		<dc:creator>Poll: I got the red rings of death, should I just sell all my Xbox games and get a PS3 or just get it repaired? &#124; XBox 360 Fix Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6739#comment-39256</guid>
		<description>[...] Frivolous : Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Frivolous : Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duplex Laser Printer &#8211; What else? &#124; Best Color Laser Printer</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/03/frivolous/comment-page-1#comment-39249</link>
		<dc:creator>Duplex Laser Printer &#8211; What else? &#124; Best Color Laser Printer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/?p=6739#comment-39249</guid>
		<description>[...] Frivolous : Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Frivolous : Lawyers, Guns &amp; Money [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

