Subscribe via RSS Feed

WAPO: Robert Nozick is the Only Acceptable Definer of Human Rights

[ 0 ] December 28, 2009 | Scott Lemieux

Shorter Fred Hiatt: FDR was a total commie; King and his so-called “civil rights” maybe even worse. They probably didn’t even understand that “human rights” should be defined exclusively in the terms that will maximize the imperialist power of the United States. Let’s also completely ignore the fact that, in practice, the protection of even “negative” rights requires the substantial expenditure of state resources, making them no more “natural” by our logic by any other.

Matt has more about the editorial that “really breaks new ground in terms of red baiting and absurdity.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.

  • Tags

    2008 campaign 2008 democratic primary 2008 elections 2008 republican primary afghanistan air force barack obama baseball books cats china civil liberties confrontation in the caucasus constitutional interpretation delusional wingnuttery foreign policy free dahlia lithwick gay and lesbian rights georgia hacktacular health care hillary clinton human rights iran Iraq war i see dead people israel kentucky military procurement movies nonsense nukes Obama's Supreme Court nominations presidential statement of the day reproductive freedom russia Sarah Palin soccer Straight-Talkin' Maverick John McCain Supreme Court the alaskan clown show the arbitrary executive wingnut butchery of history wingnuttery Yuck the Fankees
  • Subscribe

    Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content..

    Privacy guaranteed. We'll never share your info.
  • Meta