Month: August 2006
Drum writes:And yet, much as I'm reluctant to agree with him, Weisberg has a point: aside from kvetching about Bush's policies, the liberal blogosphere has chosen to almost unanimously sit.
Another antidote to Weisbergian invocations of dirty, dirty hippies and objectively-pro-Islamofascists who were right about the war before it became fashionable to be. (Needless to say, TNR has hauled George.
Eschewing the notion of trying to cook up an original thought, Jacob Weisberg wastes no time descending into self-parody:The problem for the Democrats is that the anti-Lieberman insurgents go far.
When in doubt, attack Jesse Jackson:But, if Lamont is trying to put himself forward as a new face in the Democratic Party, the two men who planted themselves right in.
Michael Crowley asks the right question...People who think the national media are overly obsessed with the Lieberman-Lamont race often wonder why the press doesn't pay as much attention to Rhode.
For pure, unadulterated comedy gold you can't get much better than Marty Peretz reacting to the shocking development of a Democrat winning the Democratic primary in Connecticut. Admittedly, he's so.
The good news is, as of this posting, Lamont is still ahead, with 3/4 of precincts reporting. The bad news is that he seems to have been losing ground all.
Ah, I see that some Bush apologists are finally letting their pretense that the Iraq war was going to produce a nice pro-American pro-Israeli liberal democracy fade away into more.