Month: June 2006
The Supreme Court handed down a divided opinion about the applicability of the Clean Water Act today. I'll let my two legal-eagle guest bloggers (and environmental policy specialist co-blogger) parse.
With respect to the merits of Hudson v. Michigan, I remain mostly happy to second iocaste and Lindsay. I have a couple of additional points: Orin Kerr notes the distinctly.
Cereal in the Bowl, Not on the FloorIN theory at least, pouring a bowl of cereal is one of the simplest tasks imaginable. But early-morning grogginess can wreak havoc on.
Armchair Generalist, responding to Tony Snow's claim that 2500 "is a number":No, Tony. It's not a number. "No. 2500" had a face, family, and friends. Not that he was one.
My time at LGM has come to an end. I want to thank Rob for letting me guest post, and to LGM"s readers for their wonderful and challenging comments. Special.
For once, the relationship described in the Modern Love column doesn't sound intrinsically nightmarish -- there's nothing wrong with a liberal woman falling in love with a guy in the.
Ezra suggests that, at least in California, initiatives are becoming toxically unpopular. I certainly hope that this is true, although I wonder how much of this was related to the.
So I asked for someone to point out flaws in that study of day care in Quebec I blogged on the other day, purporting to show significant negative effects from.